1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aliya0001 [1]
3 years ago
14

In the year 2010, the income per worker in the United States was $82,359 and the income per worker in South Korea was $54,315. T

he income per worker in South Korea if the technology were at US level would be $74,496. What part of the income per worker gap between the US and South Korea can be explained by differences in human capital and physical capital
Business
1 answer:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The difference in human capital explains $7,863 of the income per worker gap while the difference in physical capital explains $20,181 of the income per worker gap.

Explanation:

Human capital refers to the skills, knowledge, and efforts of the people in producing goods and services. It is also known simply as labor. Physical capital refers to the "man-made" goods that assist in production, including machinery, equipment, and technological items such as computers.

In the given scenario, the income per worker in the United States is $82,359 - $54,315 = $28,044 more than the income per worker in South Korea. This is explained by differences in both the level of technology (i.e. physical capital) and the capability of workers (i.e. human capital).

We are informed that the income per worker in South Korea would be $74,496 if it had the same level of technology as the United States. This means that $74,496 - $54,315 = $20,181 of the income per worker gap between the two countries is explained by differences in physical capital. Hence the remaining difference of $28,044 - $20,181 = $7,863 is explained by differences in human capital between the two countries.

You might be interested in
In double entry bookkeeping, where should you record assets?
vekshin1
Hi there :-)

The answer is
A. In the left debits column

Hope it helps
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Assume that at the end of the next year, Company A will pay a $2.00 dividend per share, an increase from the current dividend of
Bezzdna [24]

Answer:

The  value of the stock is $28.57

Explanation:

Data provided in the question:

Dividend paid at the end of the year, D1 = $2.00 per share

Increase in dividend = $1.50 per share

Growth rate, g = 5% = 0.05

Required rate of return = 12% = 0.12

Now,

Price with constant Dividend Growth model = D1 ÷ ( r - g )

= $2 ÷ ( 0.12 - 0.05 )

= $28.57

Hence,

The  value of the stock is $28.57

4 0
3 years ago
Researchers set up a study to determine whether large doses of a nutritional supplement would shorten the length of time it take
ozzi
<span>This study indicates that nutritional supplements do not have an affect on the common cold. The volunteers that were given the supplement did not experience any significant differences in the duration of their cold. They had the cold for the same duration that the volunteers who were given the placebo did.</span>
4 0
2 years ago
Suppose a company owns a warehouse that costs $500,000 and depreciates at $10,000 per year. If the interest rate is 5%, what is
netineya [11]

Answer: $35,000

Explanation:

Implicit rental price = Interest payment + Depreciation

Interest payment = 5% * 500,000

= $25,000

Implicit rental price is therefore:

= 25,000 + 10,000

= $35,000

4 0
3 years ago
A company has two divisions and evaluates management using return on investment. Division 1 currently makes a part that it sells
Anton [14]

Answer:

c. Division 1 should continue to do business with Division 2 because Division 1's variable cost per part is only $18.

Explanation:

Since the variable cost per part is only $18 and Division 1  sells to Division 2 at $25, it is in the company's overall interest that business should continue between the two divisions.

The cost of getting the part from outside is $26.  This will incur more cost to the company and create excess capacity for Division 1.

Fixed costs are not relevant in making a decision of this nature.  The costs would be incurred irrespective of the decision made.  They are therefore irrelevant.  The relevant cost is the variable cost of $18 per unit.  It should be the focus of the decision, including the possibility of excess capacity for Division 1.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is true when developing a brand?
    10·2 answers
  • Replay Sports Stores and SportsPower Products, Inc., enter into a contract for a sale of trampolines. SportsPower Products is a
    12·1 answer
  • You are told the column totals in a trial balance are not equal. After careful analysis, you discover only one error. Specifical
    13·1 answer
  • Is the U.S. airline industry attractive? Describe Southwest Airlines’ strategy. What are the most important strategic choices? W
    14·1 answer
  • Joe Keho and Mike McLain share income on a 6:4 basis. They have capital balances of $90,000 and $70,000, respectively, when Lind
    11·1 answer
  • A store purchases televisions from a factory for $\$$87.89 each. The store normally sells one of these televisions for 225$\%$ o
    9·2 answers
  • Practice Question 25 Which one of the following is an effective method of evaluating a cost center? Compare actual total costs w
    13·2 answers
  • Barclay Enterprises manufactures and sells three distinct styles of bicycles: the Youth model sells for $370 and has a unit cont
    11·1 answer
  • The doctrine that allows for a more flexible use of copyrighted material such as for educational purposes is known as _____.
    14·1 answer
  • Main supplies is a publicly traded firm with 250,000 shares of stock outstanding. if the firm issues an additional 10,000 shares
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!