1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolbaska11 [484]
3 years ago
8

Constructive conflict: Group of answer choices should never be used as a conflict management strategy. should be encouraged for

better decision making and performance. is one of the most common outcomes of conflict. is the only conflict management style that has high assertiveness and low cooperativeness. is the main source of conflict in organizations.
Business
1 answer:
leva [86]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Constructive conflict should be encouraged for better decision making and performance

Explanation:

Constructive conflict is a positive form of conflict in an organization. It arises when people have different ideas, values and opinions and come together to find the best solution. It is encouraged among teamwork because it allows to find the most creative solutions to problems as everyone corporates and shares different thoughts and views. Participants talk openly and respect other people’s views and opinions. They are also willing to let go of their own ego and agree to someone else’s solution if they are persuaded that it is a better solution than their own. Mediators and facilitators are sometimes used to ensure that a conflict remains constructive as opposed to destructive.

You might be interested in
Crane Corporation is reviewing an investment proposal. The initial cost is $103,400. Estimates of the book value of the investme
navik [9.2K]

a) The cash payback period for Crane Corporation's investment proposal is 3 years.

b) The annual rate of return for the investment is as follows:

Year 1 = 10% ($10,700/$104,500 x 100)

Year 2 = 19% ($13,100/$69,300 x 100)

Year 3 = 33% ($14,000/$42,100 x 100)

Year 4 = 82.5% ($17,400/$21,100 x 100)

Year 5 = 232% ($17,900/$7,700 x 100)

c) The net present value of the investment by Crane Corporation is $30,643.

<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>

Target rate of return = 11%

Year   Initial Cost and Book Value  Annual Cash      Annual Net

                                                               Flows                Income

0                 $104,500

1                                        69,300        $45,900            $10,700

2                                        42,100          40,300               13,100

3                                         21,100         35,000               14,000

4                                         7,700          30,800               17,400

5                                               0          25,600                17,900

The cash payback period is <u>3 years</u> ($104,500 - $45,900 - $40,300 - $35,000).

<h3>Net Present Value:</h3>

Year   Annual Cash Flows    PV Factor        Present Value

0               -$104,500                     1                 -$104,500

1                  $45,900                0.901                  $41,356

2                 $40,300                0.812                   32,724

3                 $35,000                 0.731                  25,585

4                 $30,800                0.659                 20,297

5                $25,600                 0.593                   15,181

Net Present value =                                        $30.643

Learn more about the payback period and NPV at brainly.com/question/16999673

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Richardson motors uses 10 units of part no. t305 each month in the production of large diesel engines. the cost to manufacture o
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

Richardson's opportunity cost is $8,000

Explanation:

If Richardson motors manufacture t305 themselves the total manufacturing cost per unit is $42,400.

Overhead of $24,000 is 1/3 variable and 2/3 of fixed, that means $16,000 of that would continue.

Therefore the avoidable variable manufacturing cost per unit is $24,000+$2000+$400= $26,400.

But, if Richardson Motors decides to buy the t305 from Simpson Castings then the per unit variable cost will be $36,000 ($30,000 purchase price + $6,000 material handling cost applied {i.e 20% X $30,000 per unit}).

Therefore, if they buy from Simpson Castings the per unit cost of the t305 component will no longer be the same. There will be an increase

I.e $36,000-$26,400=$9,600

If they buy 10 units per month, the total cost per month would increase by $9,600 X 10 =$96000.

If Richardson Motors happens to use the idle capacity to manufacture another product that would contribute $104,000 per month, then the opportunity cost would be:

$104,000 - $96,000 = $8,000

7 0
2 years ago
"A 45-year old man earns $150,000 per year and is covered by his employer's 401(k) Plan. He quits" his job and moves to a new co
DaniilM [7]

Answer:

Not to leave previous job.

Explanation:

  • First of all, the question is that what he will lose after leaving the job?
  • His earning per year is equal at both sides, still what's the opportunity cost for him?

<em>The answer is simple,</em> he may earn equal but if looked at it in a bigger picture he is losing 401k retirement plan and It is his opportunity cost. He may regret this after leaving the job.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is NOT true regarding​ forecasting? A. Forecasting may involve taking historical data and proj
laiz [17]

Answer: Forecasting is exclusively an objective prediction.

Explanation: In simple words, the process of predicting any future event by analyzing the past data is called the forecasting. The factors that an analyst takes from the past could be both qualitative and quantitative.

     The forecasting process is done for a specified period and not for infinity. In other words, it is the study of trends and predicting how these trends could change in the future.

Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B.

6 0
3 years ago
Blaster, Inc., manufactures portable radios. Each radio requires 3 units of Part XBEZ52, which has a standard cost of $1.25 per
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

1,065 U

Explanation:

Materials Price Variance = Actual Quantity Purchased * (Standard Price – Actual Price)Actual Price= Total Cost / Quantity Purchased

= ($27,690 /21,300 )=$ 1.3

=21,300* [$1.25 – $1.3]

=21,300*0.05

=1,065 U

During May, the materials price variance for part XBEZ52 was 1,065 which is Unfavourable because the actual

purchase price is higher than standard.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is rand corporation a liberal or conservative company?
    14·1 answer
  • Pedro’s favorite subject has always been English literature. Which of the following might be a good career choice?
    14·2 answers
  • A study sponsored by the american medical association suggests that the absolute value of the own price elasticity for surgical
    8·1 answer
  • -Organizational skills
    14·2 answers
  • Match the different categories of income to the calculation used to derive them.
    6·2 answers
  • Handy Home sells windows and doors in the ratio of 8:2 (windows:doors).
    8·1 answer
  • Book value per share may not approximate market value per share because:
    12·1 answer
  • Limitations of managerial economics
    5·1 answer
  • Firm A is a profit-maximizing firm with a monopoly in the production of Good X. The firm sells its good for $10 each. We can con
    14·1 answer
  • A property sold in april for $216,500. it sold again 9 months later for $245,750. what was its average monthly rate of appreciat
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!