A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
The answer is C: first add 2 both sides then divide both sides by -5.
Answer:
1.6 litre of milk is left
The computation shows that the time taken is 120 minutes.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
From the information, Andrew is riding his bike and he biked a distance of 14 miles at a rate of 7 miles per hour.
Therefore, time taken for 14 miles will be:
= 14/7
= 2 hours
= 2 × 60 = 120 minutes
The time taken is 120 minutes.
Learn more about computations on:
brainly.com/question/4658834
#SPJ1
Answer:
9.0
Step-by-step explanation:
x = 7 / cos 39°
= 7 / 0.7771
= 9.0
