Answer: driving to save time lives and money
Answer:
The Supreme Court's opinion in the Brown v. Board of Education case of 1954 legally ended decades of racial segregation in America's public schools. Originally named after Oliver Brown, the first of many plaintiffs listed in the lower court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, KS, the landmark decision actually resolved six separate segregation cases from four states, consolidated under the name Brown v. Board of Education. While the attorneys originally argued the cases on appeal to the Court in 1952, the featured document, School Segregation Cases - Order of Argument, offers a window into the three days in December of 1953 during which the attorneys reargued the cases.
A reargument was necessary because the Court desired briefs from both sides that would answer five questions, all having to do with the attorneys' opinions on whether or not Congress had segregation in public schools in mind when the 14th amendment was ratified. The document lists the names of each case, the states from which they came, the order in which the Court heard them, the names of the attorneys for the appellants and appellees, the total time allotted for arguments, and the dates over which the arguments took place.
The first case listed, Briggs v. Elliott, originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, in the fall of 1950. Harry Briggs was one of twenty plaintiffs who were charging that R.W. Elliott, as president of the Clarendon County School Board, violated their right to equal protection under the fourteenth amendment by upholding the county's segregated education law. Briggs featured social science testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs from some of the nation's leading child psychologists, such as Dr. Kenneth Clark, whose famous doll study concluded that segregation negatively affected the self-esteem and psyche of African-American children. Such testimony was groundbreaking because on only one other occasion in U.S. history had a plaintiff attempted to present such evidence before the Court.
Explanation:
Answer: Simply stated, these 10 Amendments are: 1. Freedom of speech, religion, press, etc. 2. Right to keep and bear arms. 3. The conditions for quartering soldiers. 4. Right of search and seizure. 5. Provisions regarding the prosecution of an individual. 6. Right to a speedy trial.
Explanation: Hope this help
Answer:
Tenemos que el condenado es la persona que va a la cárcel debido la realización de diferentes delitos.
El imputado o acusado es una persona que se le acusa de diferentes delitos pero que todavía no ha sido demostrada la veracidad de esta acusación.
Cuando a un imputado se le demuestra frente a un juicio que es responsable de diferentes delitos se le aplica una condena y por ende pasa a ser un condenado.
dame corazon y 5 estrellas todo lo que miran
Explanation:
Answer:
A social issues is a problem that influences a considerable number of the individuals within a society. Somewhere in the hundreds of thousands to the billions, sometimes even down to a few people. But it is often the consequence of factors extending beyond an individual's social issue is the source of a conflicting opinion on the grounds of what is perceived as a morally just personal life or societal order. Some social issues are really not too much of an issue in the first place such as trans gender people. Social issues are distinguished from economic issues because social issues are purely social, however, some issues (such as immigration) have both social and economic aspects.
Economic policy refers to the actions that governments take in the economic field. It covers the systems for setting levels of taxation, government budgets, the money supply and interest rates as well as the labor and market, national ownership, and many other areas of government interventions into the economy. All of witch are economic issues. too much of this can lead to a lot of social issues
