Answer:
<u>possibly</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
We use the term the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur could possibly be relied on because, if the court deemed that there's considerable evidence there was a probability that the bottler was negligent with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda.
However, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur may not be relied on if there's evidence of an absence of negligence by the bottler with regard to the safety of the bottle of soda. <em>In other words, evidence shows that there's a greater probability that the waitress may have mishandled the bottle of soda or was negligent in some way leading her injuries.</em>
The plaintiff in this question is Ms. Blair, while the defendant is Ms. Jaminez.
Who is a plaintiff?
This is a word that is used to refer to a person that brings a legal action against a person in the court of law.
In this question, Ms Blair is the one injured so she is the plaintiff who is suing.
<h3>Who is the defendant?</h3>
This is the person that is being sued in the law court. The owner of the building is the defendant here.
The defendant does not have to pay for the injury given the fact that they have placed precautionary actions for the users of the place. Ms Blair was careless.
Read more on a plaintiff here: brainly.com/question/20281216
Answer:criminal law
Explanation:
In criminal law, the offences are those that are against the state and thereby violating the criminal code of any jurisdiction. The plaintiff is the governing authority. It could be the state government or the federal government depending on which law was violated.
A plaintiff is defined as the person who files lawsuit. The term 'plaintiff' is more suitable when used in civil law rather than in criminal law.
A criminal case occur when charges are brought against a person by the government.
Answer: Im pretty sure its local.
Explanation: