Answer:
He disagree with the revolutions plans, not so much the revolution itself.
Because, he argued not the substitution as such but its programs: the French revolution needed to abolish the past of France and found a new, complex system, they make it work in actuality (and Burke said that it would not work). On the other hand, the American rebellion did not murder the British legacy: the different individual rights, the common law etc. For him, the uprising was supported by the very laws of British law.
Explanation:
That would be Feudalism, dearest. All that you have to do is look at the time frame of the Crusades.
two problems are
1. the Payne Aldrich tariff which kept unpopular tariffs high
and
2. he fired Roosevelt's hand picked head of the Interior Department Gifford Pinchot
The answer is b, the destruction of the Berlin wall.
The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
