The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "b. simultaneous lineups." Everyday occurrences, such as identifying criminals in police lineups, can be improved by using psychological experimental procedures, such as <span>simultaneous lineups.</span>
Answer:
Type II error was made
Explanation:
I will start by stating the null and alternate hypothesis
<u>Null hypothesis</u>
H0: there is no significant correlation between exercise and weight loss
<u>Alternate hypothesis</u>
H1: there is significant correlation between weight loss and exercise.
This researcher has made the mistake of accepting a false null hypothesis Instead of the alternate hypothesis as the question says that there is significant correlation between exercise and weight loss. A type II error has therefore been made.
A type II error is an error of omission and it occurs when the alternate hypothesis is rejected and the null hypothesis is accepted.
please note that the multiple choice options that were added to the question is not related to the question that was asked in anyway and must have been a mistake.
Answer:
E. focusing on personal appearance and delivery
Explanation:
If Jessica watched the whole debate that took place in only four candidates and does not remember the main points discussed, it means that something distracted her. The tip of the text is that she was impressed with the appearance and position of a candidate, but does not even remember what that same candidate said. Thus, it is assumed that she judged the appearance rather than the content of the candidates.
Answer:
a tilte
Explanation:
since the excerpt is about deforestation and its at the top
The answer to this question, based on the precedent set by Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School is that there is a valid contract; the school bound itself to honor the obligations set forth in the college catalog.
The Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School case occurred in 1973, when Robert Steinberg applied for admission at Chicago Medical School only to be rejected and Steinberg filed a class action claiming that the school did not evaluate his application according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school’s bulletin – Steinberg claimed that the decision to admit the student is based on nonacademic criteria. The court ruled that Steinberg deserves to have his application judged according to the school’s stated criteria.
