Answer:
I would say "Chips and cookies are high in fats and sugars which increases the risk of obesity.", because it is a direct cause of the problem, student obesity. :)
Commons
“How did Faulkner pull it off?” is a question many a fledgling writer has asked themselves while struggling through a period of apprenticeship like that novelist John Barth describes in his 1999 talk "My Faulkner." Barth “reorchestrated” his literary heroes, he says, “in search of my writerly self... downloading my innumerable predecessors as only an insatiable green apprentice can.” Surely a great many writers can relate when Barth says, “it was Faulkner at his most involuted and incantatory who most enchanted me.” For many a writer, the Faulknerian sentence is an irresistible labyrinth. His syntax has a way of weaving itself into the unconscious, emerging as fair to middling imitation.
While studying at Johns Hopkins University, Barth found himself writing about his native Eastern Shore Maryland in a pastiche style of “middle Faulkner and late Joyce.” He may have won some praise from a visiting young William Styron, “but the finished opus didn’t fly—for one thing, because Faulkner intimately knew his Snopses and Compsons and Sartorises, as I did not know my made-up denizens of the Maryland marsh.” The advice to write only what you know may not be worth much as a universal commandment. But studying the way that Faulkner wrote when he turned to the subjects he knew best provides an object lesson on how powerful a literary resource intimacy can be
I enjoy reading fantasy.
I spend about 5 hours a week reading.
I buy about two books a month.
I prefer fantasy and horror.
Answer:
Walt Whitman
Explanation:
<u>Walt Whitman is usually called "the father of the free verse". </u><u>Whitman had to self-publish the first book of poems, </u><em><u>Leaves of Grass</u></em><u>, with his own money in 1855. It was considered too off the standards of British poetry of the time. </u>
Even if it is considered one of his greatest books to this day, only the few copies were sold and it received very mixed reviews at the time, especially because of the free verse he used.
