The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
Question in unclear..but I would say chemicals/hazards..?
The answer is number a is true
1. Complete all your works
2. Study for your test
Answer:
B. Kublai Khan was able to conquer all of China, while Genghis Khan
was not.
Explanation:
He was able to increase the empire and even conquer more. Compared to his father, he was really successful.
