Answer:
Option: The destruction of trading routes in Eurasia.
Explanation:
Mongol's military conquest led the empire to widespread. They are known as Nomadic horse people from the eastern steppe lands of Asia. The Mongols briefly ruled most of Eastern Europe, Asia and the Middle East. The Mongol conquest in Eurasia led to the decline of established empires along with killing people. Even though the Mongol tried to assimilate the Persian culture but could not survive as the Mongol regime in Persia declined in the 1330s. Trade disrupt in the East led to the Europeans to take the sea route to reach Asia for trade.
Answer:
see below the con and pros
Explanation:
pros
in the modern-day city of Istanbul which was Constantinople, now its Istanbul, not Constantinople. Which provided the inspiration for a song made famous by They Might Be Giants.
cons
the fall of Byzantine empire, the question of what life would be like, if it hadn’t, will never be answered. Sure, there might be some alternate reality where the Byzantines are alive and well. Aspects of string theory certainly suggest so. But who knows what the modern political landscape might look like with the formal existence of the Byzantine?
pros
The fall of the Byzantine empire is part of the history of the world, as we know it. We might wear hats on our feet for all we know. What might the world look like if the empire had not fallen?
cons
Fall of the Byzantine empire led to an abundance of knowledge that is lost forever, think about that forever. The loss of “Greek Fire” is definitely a drag. Greek Fire was an incendiary weapon used by the Byzantine navy, and could burn on water. No one knows just what went into that technological advantage possessed by the Byzantines.
Answer:
Because it was a failed attack on Fidel Castro
Explanation:
Basically the JFK administration worked with the CIA to launch a sneak attack on a Fidel Castro lead Cuba, the plan failed miserably and it not only made the Kennedy administration look bad, but it also showed hostility towards cuba from the U.S causing a conflict
Answer: President kennedy.
Explanation: no thank you.
Explanation:
Because of new technology like weapons, strategies, and transportation, the nature of warfare changed immensely during and after the Civil War.
