Answer:
He defined a nation as "an imagined political community".As Anderson puts it, a nation "is imagined because the members of even the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion".[1] Members of the community probably will never know each of the other members face to face; however, they may have similar interests or identify as part of the same nation. Members hold in their minds a mental image of their affinity: for example, the nationhood felt with other members of your nation when your "imagined community" participates in a larger event such as the Olympic Games. Finally, a nation is a community because,
regardless of the actual inequality and exploitation that may prevail in each, the nation is always conceived as a deep, horizontal comradeship. Ultimately it is this fraternity that makes it possible, over the past two centuries, for so many millions of people, not so much to kill, as willingly to die for such limited imaginings.
Looking at the information, candidate A would likely be in favor of government-funded health care. Candidate B would be probably be opposed to it.
<h3 /><h3>How to identify the motivations of a political candidate?</h3>
The analysis of a political debate is an essential tool to understand the proposal of each politician, especially when their ideas are refuted, thus helping the voter in the best comparison between government proposals and candidate choice.
Therefore, in the debate of the issue it is possible to better understand the position of candidates A and B in relation to responsibilities, leading to a greater probability of identifying a possible action of each in a situation.
Find out more about political debate here:
brainly.com/question/18038622
#SPJ1
Answer:
well...
Explanation:
No not all police officers are bad..
But some are...
The police system is very corrupt and rasict.
There are officers that kill, and murder others based on them being a diffent skin color then white, being in the lgbtq comminty, etc
But there are some great officers out there, that protect us at all cause so i guess the answer is... yes and no?
Direct democracy would be extremely costly because people would have to vote on every single thing and this would cost time and money to ensure everyone has voted. It couldn't be resolved in early times, but maybe with the age of technology, you could surpass that by having everyone vote online or something similar.
Answer:THE PEASANTS.
Explanation::The Third Estate included approximately ninety-eight percent of the French population under the Old Regime contained THE PEASANTS. Hope This Helps My Friend:)
