Answer:
Each grilled cheese costs $1.25
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Her income is $50 a week. Hamburgers cost $4, and she consumes 10 of them. She consumes eight grilled cheese sandwiches.
To calculate the price of the grilled cheese sandwiches, we need to use the following equation:
Income= cost of hamburgers*number of units + cost of grilled cheese*number of units
50= 4*10 + x*8
10=8x
$1.25= x= grilled cheese
Answer:
3.14 years
Explanation:
Year Cash flow Accumulated cash flows
0 -$4,900 -$4,900
1 $1,150 -$3,750
2 $1,350 -$2,400
3 $2,230 -$170
4 $1,250 $1,080
3 years + $170/$1,250 = 3.14
The payback period is 3.14 years, or 3 years, 1 month and 19 days.
Answer:
1. Small expenditures which primarily benefit the current period. REVENUE EXPENDITURES
2. Cost less accumulated depreciation. BOOK VALUE
3. An accelerated depreciation method used for financial statement purposes. DOUBLE DECLINING BALANCE METHOD
4. Tangible resources that are used in operations and are not intended for resale. PLANT ASSETS
5. Equal amount of depreciation each period. STRAIGHT LINE METHOD
6. Expected cash value of the asset at the end of its useful life. SALVAGE VALUE
7. Process of allocating the cost of equipment over its service life. DEPRECIATION
8. Material expenditures that increase an asset's operating efficiency, productive capacity, or useful life CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
9. An accelerated depreciation method used for tax purposes. MACRS
10. Useful life is expressed in terms of units of production or expected use. UNITS OF ACTIVITY METHOD
Explanation:
I would say letter “E” but the government already knows all of our personal information, so whats the point... probably being watched threw your computer/phone camera rn
Answer:
The correct answer is that: informants are difficult to control and the police can not trust in them always.
Explanation:
To begin with, if the police officer finds out that the informant went behind his back and purchase drug then the officer must understand that the informant is not trustful and moreover<u> he could mean a risk to the whole undercover operation</u> that the police officer is managing, therefore that the scenario is propounding that situations like that exemplify that informants can not be trusted due to the fact that they are ex convicted and that is why the officers have to be carefull when working with them.
