The wrong statement: The volume or the smaller cone cannot be determined because its height is unknown.
We already know that the larger cone has a height of 8 cm and that the smaller cone is just 1/4 of 8 cm.
8×1/4 = 2 cm.
You can still find its volume by using the formula 1/3πr^2.
Well first we need to change the format of the equations to slope-intercept, or y=mx+b.
So the first one (x + y < 1) will be changed to y < -x + 1.
The second one (2y ≥ x - 4) will be changed to y <span>≥ x/2 - 2.
Now we can analyze each graph.
In every single graph the first equation (y < -x + 1) is graphed correctly.
Now for the second equation, we can see that only the first and last graph correctly format to the equation.
Now for the shading:
The first equation shows us that y is less than -x +1, making the shading go under the dotted line. (to the left)
The second equation shows us that y is greater than or equal to x/2 - 2, making the shading go above the line. (also to the left)
Therefore, when we shade, the overlapping shading is correctly formatted in the first graph.
Hope this helped, comment any questions you have for me.</span>
3
1
390
x 42
-------
1282
1564
----------------
the answer would be 16380
Hope this helped :)
Answer:
For measuring such small amounts of medicine, your doctor may give you a 1 cc syringe (there is that cubic centimeter thing again - remember, it is the same as a milliliter - ml).
...
measurement of medicines.
1/4 teaspoon 1.25 ml
1 teaspoon 5 ml
1-1/2 teaspoon 7.5 ml
1 tablespoon 15 ml
Step-by-step explanation:
