Answer:
For the Economist A the spending multiplier is = 8, the tax multiplier = 4, the increase in spending is = $4 billion, the tax cut is = $8 billion.
For the Economist B, the spending multiplier is =4, the tax multiplier = 2, the increase in spending is = $8 billion, the tax cut is = $16 billion.
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
(1)The Economist A
The Spending multiplier = 8
In closing the output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 8 = $4 billion
Thus,
The tax multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
(2)The Economist B
Now,
The spending multiplier = 4
To close output gap of $32 billion, required increase in spending = $32 billion / 4 = $8 billion
So,
Tax multiplier = 2
To close output gap of $32 billion, required decrease in tax = $32 billion / 2 = $16 billion
As part of PSM standards, hazards communication standards require employers of different companies who use hazardous, unsafe and life threatening chemicals "to check, evaluate, classify and label each of those chemicals". These standards are developed and established by OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Organization).
The inference is that the contractor will prevail because the homeowner agreed to the price increase.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
It should be noted that an inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given.
In this base, inference is that the contractor will prevail because the homeowner agreed to the price increase.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ1
Jasper could most certainly claim depreciation on the computer that is, 50% of it plus 50% of the purchase price and I know because I am self-employed too and I know that legitimate office expenses like a new printer, printer paper etc can be claimed according to the amount used for the business.
