1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jek_recluse [69]
3 years ago
8

Why did the United States remain neutral in the war between France and Great Britain?

History
2 answers:
klemol [59]3 years ago
8 0

Because the economy of the united states depended on trade with great Britain

Korvikt [17]3 years ago
5 0
The Proclamation of Neutrality was a formal announcement issued by U.S. President George Washington on April 22, 1793 that declared the nation neutral in the conflict between France and Great Britain. It threatened legal proceedings against any American providing assistance to any country at war.
You might be interested in
The continental congress asked for help from the French and who did they receive aid from
Mariana [72]

Answer:

the present i think

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What nine new nations created by the treaty of versailles?
liubo4ka [24]
The treaty of Versailles was a peace breaker (apparently), therefore, ending World War I. It brought Germany to great suffering; "...starving the children..." - I don't remember who that was by, but its important quote to know. That's only the partial speech, search up the speech and hopefully, you'll find it, otherwise ask your History teacher.

Nine nations created by the Treaty: Poland, Estonia, Finland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Yogoslavakia, Latvia, Estonia, and Austria. 
Germany was deprived of 12.5 percent of population, 10 percent of the land, all of its colonies, 16 percent of its natural resources (steel, gold etc)...War Guilt Clause 231... These are some important notes to take. However, the allies did not cut off their oil supply, this, in turn, helped Germany perp for WWII. 
If you're writing about Hitler's Rise to Power, you could also include the Policy of Appeasement, and ofc the Treaty of Versailles. 

I hope this helped :)
6 0
3 years ago
What were the differences between the two parties?
arsen [322]

Answer: The Democratic Republican Party and the Federalists

Explanation:

The Federalists wanted a strong federal government whereas the DRP defended states' rights.

They disagreed on central banking, Hamilton(Federalist) wanted to have a federal entity to control the issuing of money(a central bank) which Jefferson(DRP) strongly opposed since the power of the bankers to control monetary creation would endanger individual liberties.

They disagreed on their interpretation of the Constitution, someone like Marshall (Chief Justice of the USA, 1800-1835) defended a loose interpretation of the Constitution whereas Jefferson stood for a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which words best describe king leopold ii’s actions in central africa?
serg [7]

Answer:

cruel, ruthless, genocidal

Explanation:

Leopold II, who reigned in Belgium between 1865 and 1909, sought to turn his small country into an imperial power for which he led efforts to develop the Congo River basin.

Arguing his desire to bring the benefits of Christianity, Western civilization and commerce to African natives, the monarch convinced the Eurasian powers to allow him to take control of that vast region through an organization he called the International African Association and that In 1885 he transformed into the Free State of Congo.

This private institution was not linked to the Belgian state but depended directly on the monarch, who presented himself as his "owner." It was the only private colony in the world.

But behind the philanthropic discourse of Leopold II there was a great interest in seizing the great wealth of the territory.

First, of ivory, which was immensely appreciated at the time.

Thus arose most of the wealth obtained by the monarch during the first years of the Free State of Congo.

Gradually, interest in ivory was displaced by rubber fever, when in the 1890s its use skyrocketed to produce bicycle and car wheels.

There are also many stories about the crudeness with which this material was exploited in the territories controlled by Leopold II.

He turned his 'Free State of the Congo' into a massive labor camp, made a fortune for himself by collecting rubber and contributed greatly to the death of perhaps 10 million innocents.

In 1998, the American historian Adam Hochschild published a book in which Leopold II was designated as responsible for a kind of African holocaust, which would exceed the number of dead Jews by Nazi Germany in number of victims.

What there is a coincidence among scholars was in the brutal methods used by the representatives of Leopold II to force the native population to exploit the rubber.

The method to force Congolese to work was as follows: they entered a village by force, took women and girls hostage and ordered men to enter the jungle to collect a certain quota of rubber.

While the men fulfilled the task imposed to save their wives and daughters, they starved or were subjected to sexual abuse.

In addition, those who were not able to complete the quota that had been imposed on them were threatened with the amputation of one of their hands or those of one of their children.

Is it enough to qualify Leopold II as a genocidal?

5 0
3 years ago
Why did nativist dislike the new immigrants? ​
inna [77]

The correct answer is C. They supposedly took jobs from white Americans

Explanation:

Nativism is a political perspective that promotes the welfare and interests of natives in a territory over those of immigrants. This political perspective emerged in the 19th century in the U.S. and persist to this day. Additionally, this was especially strong during the 20th century when thousands of immigrants moved to the U.S. to settle in cities and work in factories as this was a growing sector in the country. Moreover, nativists argued immigrants took the jobs and opportunities of white Americans, and therefore immigration should be restricted as natives (white Americans) should be first than immigrants. Thus, nativist dislike immigrants because "they supposedly took jobs from white Americans."

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are some ways Greece might not be such a shining example of an enlightened society? What were some of the problems? List 3
    7·1 answer
  • Northerners refused to allow blacks to join the Union army at the start of the war because they believed they could not fight. Q
    15·2 answers
  • Which country soon followed portugal in the race to find a sea route to india?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain why Britain banned colonists of settling west of the Appalachian mountains
    14·2 answers
  • Who does this description describe. Influenced by the chaotic times which he lived,this scholar wanted to bring good government
    7·2 answers
  • The influence of geographic factors in England is most evident in the development of
    10·1 answer
  • What was the first permanent settlement in South Carolina
    11·2 answers
  • Why was CODESA 1 and 2 established​
    9·1 answer
  • Which natural event led to the decline of the Middle Kingdom?
    7·1 answer
  • How can resistance be spiritual and not just physical?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!