Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.
According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.
If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000. When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.
The false statement is C. his findings supported religious theories of the church and ignored scientific evidence.
His observations through the telescope (scientific evidence) validated Copernicus's heliocentric theory, which went against the Church theory geocentric theory.
Answer: The correct answer is A- Native Americans lost much of the land that they had before the passage of the act.
Explanation:
League of United Latin America Citizens?
