1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
4vir4ik [10]
3 years ago
5

what is the difference between a photograph taken by an eyewitness to an events and a painting depicting the same event

History
2 answers:
maks197457 [2]3 years ago
6 0
From what google is telling me. It is about primary and secondary source. 
MakcuM [25]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A photograph is a primary source while the painting is a secondary source. The photograph taken by an eyewitness is a primary source because the photographer is present during the actual event, while the painting created later from the memories of the events is a secondary source because the painter is not present during the event. He/She merely uses the memory of the event for the painting.

<em>A primary sources is direct and firsthand experience about an event, person or object.They are original materials on which a research is based. Memoirs, diaries, interviews and surveys are considered as primary sources. Secondary sources are the interpretations, analysis, evaluation and summary of primary sources.It is not the direct or first hand account of an event. Secondary sources include textbooks, bibliographies, reference books, magazine articles and treatises. </em>

<em> </em>

<em> </em>

<em> </em>

<em> </em>

<em> </em>

You might be interested in
Please help me. I will mark brainliest!!!
raketka [301]

Answer:

whats your question i can't see it!

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The fact that the actual negligent must directly cause the injury is called:
IRINA_888 [86]
It's called 'cause in fact' 
3 0
3 years ago
What characteristics of<br> a fox did Francis Marion demonstrate as a<br> guerrilla leader?
koban [17]
One characteristic is that he was famous for his uncanny ability to elude and outsmart British forces.
5 0
3 years ago
The Axis powers consisted of:
S_A_V [24]
The answer is D: Germany, Italy, and Japan

Explanation
A coalition of nations led by Germany, Italy, and Japan known as the Axis powers opposed the Allied powers during World War II.
3 0
2 years ago
How was Euripide's work different from that of Sophocles and Aeschylus?​
navik [9.2K]

Answer: Euripides did not cater to popular Athenian entertainment, whereas Sophocles did just that. Those two often wrote on divine matters, whereas Euripides did not.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Mississippi Company control Louisiana?
    9·1 answer
  • List 2-3 ways that the Chinese Dynasties were different from the Ottoman and Mughal Empires.
    5·1 answer
  • To what extent was the continental system responsible for the down fall of Napoleon Bonaparte ​
    10·1 answer
  • View the picture for the question.​
    9·1 answer
  • A large number of south carolina's original settlers were british planters from:
    14·2 answers
  • How did the united states expand its borders to include 48 of todays 50 states
    12·1 answer
  • A map showing just the outlines of Asia Africa and Europe would probably be used to show A.Streams and rivers B. State capitals
    10·1 answer
  • 3. Which statement about the Peoria Speech is CORRECT?
    13·2 answers
  • Why was Queen Hatshepsut’s tax policy significant?
    15·2 answers
  • How might population-based representation be a problem?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!