1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Assoli18 [71]
4 years ago
8

How is the Electoral College a form of indirect democracy? it takes a person’s vote and diverts it away from the popular vote it

allows for a person’s vote to count, but in an ancillary way it determines the number of senators a state can have it creates a loophole for non US citizens to vote
History
2 answers:
denis-greek [22]4 years ago
8 0
Should be the second option
Andreas93 [3]4 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) it allows a person's vote to count but in an ancillary way.

<em>The Electoral College is a form of indirect democracy in that it allows a person's vote to count but in an ancillary way.</em>

In the United States presidential elections, the winner is not the candidate that receives the majority of votes, like in other countries. The winner is decided by the Electoral College that is formed just for the Presidential election. The U.S. Electoral College has 538 electors and it is needed 270 electors for a candidate to win the election. That is why the Electoral College is a form of indirect democracy in that it allows a person's vote to count but in an ancillary way.

You might be interested in
7. How do Muslims view Judaism and Christianity?
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

There are many similarities between these religions so, most likely with some form of respect.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is the case United States V. Nixon important?
nignag [31]
The US wanted to know if nixon was responsible for watergate(he was), and he almost became the first impeached president.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What interest would a catholic cardinal have in settling a new land?
Natali5045456 [20]
1_don t assume honesty
2_Employ ''four eyes''
3_Rely on lay expertise
4_other points
8 0
3 years ago
Compare president truman's attitude toward and efforts on behalf of civil rights with those of president eisenhower.
Serjik [45]

Generally speaking, both of the presidents (Truman and Eisenhower) were in favor of African American civil rights and were opposed to discrimination and segregation. In fact, both of them took important steps in support of civil rights.


These two presidents, however differ in their attitudes, when it comes to the issue of using law to end segregation and discrimination. Unlike Truman, Eisenhower is known for his doubts on this issue. He was of the notion that it was impossible to force people to change by changing laws. This difference could actually have been because <span>Eisenhower was in office at a time when more activism was occurring, while activism was not the order of the day during Truman's time.</span>

6 0
4 years ago
How did the government respond to the protest?
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

they usually send officers or try to die down the protests if they get to violent

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Approximately how long ago did the Neolithic revolution begin
    10·1 answer
  • What are the following best describes the emergence of social classes and early civilization
    5·1 answer
  • On which tier can the courts of general jurisdiction​ (trial courts) be found in the federal court​ system?
    8·1 answer
  • Question 6
    6·1 answer
  • What did Hobbes think government control was necessary for
    6·1 answer
  • The word renaissance means rebirth of
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE CROWN
    5·2 answers
  • Whats the meanig of life
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Egypt decline
    12·1 answer
  • What was one way in which Portuguese and Spanish colonies similar
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!