<h2>Through t
he concept of prosecutorial immunity.</h2>
Explanation:
In Kalina v. Fletcher (1997), the court ruled that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant. This is occurred when Prosecutor Kalina was sued by Fletcher for making two inaccurate factual statements regarding him during his trial.
Prosecutor Kalina, therefore, seeked the provisions of prosecutorial immunity from the court to gain immunity. However, this was rejected as the court claimed that a prosecutor may be sued for making false statements of fact in an affidavit in support of an arrest warrant.
This ruling correlate with the concept of prosecutorial immunity becuase she was denied of such immunity. It ruled that her conduct could not be protected through prosecutorial immunity.
Both were poor peasants; other leaders were upper-class or well educated or from the military.
i hope i could help! good luck:)
After the war was over, much rebuilding and reconstruction needed to be done to aid the economies of the European nations, for they were the ones that were most harmed by the war, The Marshall Plan gave the European Nations about 13 Billion Dollars to do so. Therefore, the answer would be A since the money did aid Europe and because America was the one that gave it, it did promote prosperity and democracy
Answer: A
Hope this helped!! :D
Your answer is) People have become more interested in protecting wetlands than they used to be.
