According to Booker Washington, Africa Americans should try to attain industrial education but according to W.E.B. Du Bois, they should attain liberal arts education.
<h3 /><h3>Why did both people differ in this regard?</h3>
Booker Washington believed that Blacks should focus on wealth accumulation and to him the faster way to do this was to learn industrial skills that would allow them to set up service industries.
W.E.B. Du Bois on the other hand, wanted Blacks to get the same liberal arts education that White people did as he believed this would contribute to equality.
Note that Document B wasn't attached so I gave a general answer.
Find out more on Booker T. Washington at brainly.com/question/858463.
Explanation:
I want to live in democratic country because in democratic country the Peoplre only govern themselves by choosing their representatives
Answer:
How is the Munich conference an example of appeasement?
An example of appeasement is the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement, in which Great Britain sought to avoid war with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy by taking no action to prevent Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 or Germany's annexation of Austria in 1938.
Explanation:
Answer:
Slavery is not an institution that developed itself. Many people used the Bible as their justification of slavery. In the book of Genesis, chapter 9, Noah's youngest son Ham saw the nakedness of his father and had him covered, by his brothers. Noah then cursed Ham to be a servant to his brothers forever, Genesis 9:25-26 "Cursed be Canaan! The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers". This is known to be the first act of slavery; which people argue is sanctioned by God. Many interpret Ham's curse as placed upon people of darker skin color, Africans more specifically. The argument is that since Ham's descendants were to be slaves forever and Africans were already slaves and inferior then they should remain in slavery.
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is explained below.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a supreme court case known for establishing the principle of Judicial review in US. Judicial review means that US courts can strike down statutes, laws and other government actions that violate the US constituion. This case is considered to be the one that laid the foundation of US constitutional law. The court's opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall.
As per the provision of separation of power the constitution framers wanted the government to have enough powers so that they could run the country but wouldn't be able to abuse it. Thus they developed the provision of separation of power, according to which the power is distributed among the three branches of the the government. So that if one branch of the government tries to abuse their powers others could balance it.
Marbury vs. Madison strengthened this provision as by judicial review the court can control the Congress by declaring laws unconstitutional and illegal.
