1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
3241004551 [841]
3 years ago
16

In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on credit was that if the stock dropped, borrowers

History
2 answers:
viktelen [127]3 years ago
9 0

The correct answer is A) could not repay loans used to buy the stock.

In the 1920s, the danger of buying stock on credit was that if the stock dropped, borrowers could not repay loans used to buy the stock.

People bought the stock with the current value of that time. Pepple had tp cover the loan if the value of the stock increased. When the value falls, people had to make up the difference. That was the danger to buy stock on credit because they loaned people the money and had to be repaid.

Elena-2011 [213]3 years ago
4 0
Could not repay loans used to buy the stock
You might be interested in
It is the fourth most dangerous African city in the world.
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

Pretoria

4th most dangerous: Pretoria, South Africa

There is a serious risk of crime in South Africa's major cities, including Pretoria.Nov 1, 2019

6 0
2 years ago
What was the result of the East-West Schism?
IgorC [24]
"The Great Schism of 1054" / "East to West Schism" was the final​ speration of the eastern and western churches. (Protestant vs. Catholic) People broke away from the Catholic church for the first time NOT afraid of consequence.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What impact did the oil industry have on transportation in the United States
Andreyy89

Answer:

North America is experiencing a boom in crude oil supply, primarily due to growing production in the Canadian oil sands and the recent expansion of shale oil production from the Bakken fields in North Dakota and Montana as well as the Eagle Ford and Permian Basins in Texas. Taken together, these new supplies are fundamentally changing the U.S. oil supply-demand balance. The United States now meets 66% of its crude oil demand from production in North America, displacing imports from overseas and positioning the United States to have excess oil and refined products supplies in some regions.

The rapid expansion of North American oil production has led to significant challenges in transporting crudes efficiently and safely to domestic markets—principally refineries—using the nation’s legacy pipeline infrastructure. In the face of continued uncertainty about the prospects for additional pipeline capacity, and as a quicker, more flexible alternative to new pipeline projects, North American crude oil producers are increasingly turning to rail as a means of transporting crude supplies to U.S. markets. Railroads are more willing to enter into shorter-term contracts with shippers than pipelines, offering more flexibility in a volatile oil market. According to rail industry officials, U.S. freight railroads delivered 435,560 carloads of crude oil in 2013 (roughly equivalent to 300 million barrels), compared to 9,500 carloads in 2008. In the first half of 2014, 258,541 carloads of crude oil were delivered. Crude imports by rail from Canada have increased more than 20-fold since 2011. The amount of oil transported by rail may also be influenced by a tight market for U.S.-built tankers. However, if recent oil price declines persist and the price falls below the level at which Bakken producers can cover their costs, some production could be shut in, potentially reducing the volume of oil carried by rail.

While oil by rail has demonstrated benefits with respect to the efficient movement of oil from producing regions to market hubs, it has also raised significant concerns about transportation safety and potential impacts to the environment. The most recent data available indicate that railroads consistently spill less crude oil per ton-mile transported than other modes of land transportation. Nonetheless, safety and environmental concerns have been underscored by a series of major accidents across North America involving crude oil transportation by rail—including a catastrophic fire that caused numerous fatalities and destroyed much of Lac Mégantic, Quebec, in 2013. Following that event, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a safety alert warning that the type of crude oil being transported from the Bakken region may be more flammable than traditional heavy crude oil.

5 0
2 years ago
_____ are believed to have migrated to North America prior to European settlement by way of a land bridge.
Pie
South Americans is the answer I believe
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Zimbabwe's government in terms of the enlightenment principles?
mestny [16]
Republic
Unitary state
Semi-presidential system
Military dictatorship
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are two ways in which human services organizations find and get finances
    13·2 answers
  • Which of these statements accurately describes the Inca Empire?
    11·1 answer
  • Who coined the name for the United Nations?
    8·1 answer
  • What were the names of Martin Luther King, Jr.'s family members?
    14·1 answer
  • According to this document, how did the farmers of the constitution guard against tyranny
    10·1 answer
  • Which two European countries occupied Uruguay?<br> Spain<br> Holland<br> England<br> Portugal
    8·2 answers
  • Which constitutional principle divides power of the government between the federal and state governments? A. republicanism B. se
    9·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the winner of the Berlin Airlift during
    14·2 answers
  • .
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!