So, Bush believed that all military missions should be based on U.S. strategic interests and should have clear objectives and exit strategies. He does not want to over commit the armed forces and would like to see allies shoulder more responsibility in terms of regional conflicts. Bush believes that U.S. regional priorities consist of Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and the Far East, and he strongly supports maintaining U.S. presence in NATO. He feels that the U.S. should be prepared for military intervention if necessary, but that a strong military will act as a deterrent to security threats.
Gore assailed Bush's proposal to withdraw U.S. forces from the Balkans saying it would be "a damaging blow to NATO" and would jeopardize other U.S. alliances. He has defined six criteria for deciding whether to deploy the military: (1) Is the mission in U.S. national interests? (2) Is military force the only way to solve the conflict? (3) Have all other options been exhausted? (4) Will force solve the problem? (5) Do we have the support of allies? (6) Is the cost of the operation proportionate to the objective? Gore's policy of "forward engagement" calls for early diplomatic intervention to prevent the need for future military deployment.
:)
<span>-Germany, along with the world, was in a Depression.
-World War I had heaped unbearable levels of guilt and debt onto Germany.
-high inflation and rampant unemployment left people feeling hopeless.
These three points are the main ones
hope this helps
</span><span>-Germany's war machine was revving up its production. this was more later on, so i guess it doesn't count</span>
Well some rivers in Europe are used to transport goods. Sometime people even travel on them. River also can provide power.
Alright my friend so the best option to go with for this question will be option B. the most crucial provision of the treaty of versallies was the establishment of the League of nations
