The answer is "tallinn manual".
Initially named as, Tallinn Manual on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare<span>, Tallinn Manual</span><span> is a scholarly, non-restricting investigation on how
worldwide law applies to cyber clashes and digital fighting. In the vicinity of
2009 and 2012, the Tallinn Manual was written by a universal gathering of
roughly twenty specialists. In April 2013, the manual was distributed by Cambridge University Press.</span>
7. Southern pacific ocean, southern atlantic ocean, southern ocean and caribbean sea.
8. The earths axis is tilted 23.5 o, that means that the seasons are different depending on the area, the north pole is pointing at the sun in july, where as the south is not.
9. Plains, mountains, oceans, lakes, woodlands, northwest plateau as well (they are both in that area.)
This is false!
Attitude does not have anything to do with effectiveness: it can relate to everything. One can have an attitude towards everything: other people, ideas, places, it basically means an opinion about something, a way of thinking about something.
Ah, the scientific method. Well. Here it is:
1. Ask a question.
Be specific! Define your variables. Tara might like to ask something like “What are the effects of text-messaging rather than talking on the quality of friendships?” But she needs to define what counts as high quality and low quality friendship. Besides, what effects does she mean?
2. Make a hypothesis.
Something like “I believe the more text-messaging involved rather than taking, the lower quality the friendship will be.” Again, she should define her variables better. Make sure to use an independent and dependant variable.
3. Collect data.
Find a way to collect data. Surveys? Interviews? In-field observation? Keep it objective and informative. Remember the Hawthorne effect- don’t get to close to participants if it’s a study.
4. Represent your data.
Some people like using graphs or charts or some sort. Find a simple way to represent the data so it is easily understood.
5. Analyze and conclude
What conclusions can she draw from her research and data? Did it prove her hypothesis correct? If so, how? What else can she say about what she noticed?
There can be more or less official steps depending on your point of view. Some people like to include material lists, or theories, or sources of error. Do what you wish, but the scientific method cannot be used without first asking a question.
<span>These are a string of laws that were passed by numerous Midwestern
states such as Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Illinois during
the late 1860s to the early 1870s. This
was endorsed by a group of farmers known as the National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry whose objective was the regulation of the increasing
prices of railroad and grain elevator companies in the aftermath of the Civil
War. The outcome of the Granger Laws was different from state to state but had
the same goal of making the price of railroad rates to favor small country
farmers.</span>
