Answer:
3. No, due to unilateral mistake
Explanation:
Lacey and Cagney both had agreed to wok for 30 hours per week and the agreement is in written format since it is enforceable. Both of them are sharing 50% profits so both will have to share the duties equally. When Lacey makes an excuse and is working for 20 hours per week only Cagney can sues her and she is in a probability to win against her. Lacey should have informed Cagney about the vacation from school scenario before signing the contract.
Answer:
D) it presumes there will be economic gains even if output does not become internationally competitive
Explanation:
The argument for import protection in developing countries to bring about industrialization differs from the infant-industry argument in that it presumes there will be economic gains even if the output does not become internationally competitive. International competitiveness is a step of the relative cost of services/goods from a nation. Countries that can provide a similar quality of goods at a cheaper cost are stated to be extra competitive.
(a) Discount amount = Face value - Price of t-bills = $1,000-$996 = $4
(b) Amount received at maturity = Face value = $1,000 (Note: T-bills are guaranteed and thus one of the safest investment).
(c) Current yield, R = Discount amount/Face value * 360/t, where t = 52 weeks = 360 days.
Then,
R = (4/1000)*(360/360)*100 = 0.4%
The major factor that contributes to the decline of occupations in industries such as textile and clothing is due to the change of technology. Through the technological advancement, innovators are able to machines that work twice as fast as human beings.
