Answer:
This is really a personal opinion, since whether it is correct to send people to mars or not depends largely on your point of view and personal beliefs. Clearly, humans are far more capable than robots, and they can explore space and eventually other planets much better than a rover. On the other hand, sending people to Mars is not only extremely expensive, but it is also extremely dangerous for the astronauts themselves.
Imagine so many people died trying to get to space and then to the moon, and that was very easy compared to getting to Mars and back.
We can find millions of better ways to use the money than sending people to space, and that is really hard to argue against. Our planet, our country, state or even city could all benefit and use the money more productively.
But lets say that we do not care about the money because Mr. Bezos or some other billionaire decided to donate it. Now we would face the technical issues of going to Mars and actually staying there for a long time. A trip to mars is not something that would be carried out for just a couple of hours (like moon walking). Astronauts will have to stay in Mars for weeks, months or even years before they can return. This results in an extreme danger to their health due to cosmic rays. Can humans survive long term exposure to cosmic rays? The answer is NO and Mars's atmosphere doesn't help.
If we analyze this situation from a technical point of view, it would be better and safer to send astronauts to Titan (Saturn's moon), and would probably be also more useful. Titan's environment is similar to Earth's in many ways, and if we are actually doing it for a scientific purpose besides simply being curious, then it is much more useful to go to Titan. The scientific purpose of going to mars instead of other possible destinations is not very solid. Mars is really different to Earth and unless someone finds Martians living there, there is not much you can do.
Some non-monetary costs of attempting to eliminate risks a are time costs, search costs, and psychological costs .
Non-Monetary cost is a cost which a buyer pays other than money, to acquire a thing.The non-monetary price of acquiring a product comprises the time spent looking for it and the risk taken that it will provide the desired benefits.
Non-monetary costs are another type of sacrifice that customers feel when they purchase and use a service. When deciding whether to purchase a service or repurchase it, time costs, search costs, and psychological costs are frequently taken into consideration and may occasionally be more significant considerations than monetary price.
The psychological expenses associated with receiving these services are the most distressing non-monetary charges. Fear of rejection (bank loans), fear of not understanding (insurance), and worry of uncertainty (including fear of high cost) are all examples of fears.
To learn more about non-monetary costs here
brainly.com/question/1068495
#SPJ4
Answer:
No, it is not the right decision. The best decision that will bring maximum profit to the company is to sell chocolate syrup.
Explanation:
Profit = Sales revenue - Processing Cost
1-The Cocoa powder result in $3,900 profit ($14,000 - $10100) to the Choco Heaven company
2- If the company makes Chocolates syrup it will get profit of $34,000 ($104,000 - $70,000)
3- f the company makes Boxed assorted Chocolates it will get profit of $26,000 ($202,000 - $176,000)
Business firms that sell to retailers and other merchants, and/or to industrial, institutional, and commercial users-but which do not sell in large amounts to final consumers-are called wholesalers. These are businesses that would purchase product in very large amounts and sells them to other businesses or the retailers at a lower price whose target customers are the consumers.
Answer:
correct option is d. $600
Explanation:
given data
sells product = $20 per unit
selling price fallen = $15 per unit
FIFO inventory = 200 units
purchased = $16 per units
Net realizable value fallen = $13 per unit
to find out
amount of the lower cost of market
solution
we know that here Company record inventory at lower
so market value or cost of the inventory at declined time
and here Market Adjustment is the Difference of the cost and the Market Value
so cost will be here
Cost = 200 × $16
cost = $3200
and
Net realizable value will be
Net realizable value = 200 × $13
Net realizable value = $2600
so that Market adjustment is the difference of
Market adjustment difference = $3200 - $2600
Market adjustment difference = $600
so correct option is d. $600
