Consumers have the right to be protected against false and misleading information about goods and services.

1 answer:

3 0

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "TRUE." Consumers have the right to be protected against false and misleading information about goods and services. This statement is true as far as the consumer's right is concerned.

You might be interested in

choose the correct term for each of the following descriptions. expenditure on research and development

Anni [7]

Research and development expenses, since these costs are intended to spur future growth, they should be considered capital expenses.

The term "expenditure on research and development" (R&D) refers to all costs associated with conducting research at colleges, universities, and other institutions of higher learning, whether those costs are covered by general institutional funds, specific grants, or contracts with public or private sponsors. Nearly US$ 1.7 trillion has been spent globally on research and development, which is a record high. Approximately 10 nations receive 80% of the money spent on expenditure on research and development. Countries have committed to significantly boosting public and corporate R&D spending as well as the number of researchers by 2030 as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The total amount spent on R&D, and expenditure on research and development in the US was $607.5 billion.

Learn more about Research and development expenses here:

brainly.com/question/13493514

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

What do you understand by forester?

FromTheMoon [43]

That he will forever stay by the position

6 0

2 years ago

Suppose that there are two employers in Tinytown. CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees, while Apat

professor190 [17]

Answer:

Choose CareCo.

Explanation:

Given : CareCo offers a generous health insurance package to all employees. ApathyInc pays slightly higher wages than CareCo, but does not offer health insurance.

A person who is unhealthy & expects to have high healthcare expenses : would have issues having direct health insurance from an insurer, based on high risk evaluation. Even if by chance, he/ she gets, it will be at extremely high price i.e premium rates & is likely to have less coverage. So, the person rationally would prefer to protect himself / herself from this huge health expenditure risk, & would protect self & family from catastrophic health costs. He / she would do so by choosing to work for Care Co, which gives generous health insurance to all its employees, by sacrifising higher salary by Apathy giving no health insurance. He/ she is logical as the wage differential is likely to be less than catastrophic health costs

8 0

3 years ago

List online activities you can participate in to stack search results of your professional name for potential employers.

finlep [7]

Explanation:

let AB be the deck and CD be the hill 

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Seventeen years ago, Susan designed a corrugated steel culvert for a rural road. Her work was accepted and paid for by the count

Lemur [1.5K]

Answer:

C. Statute of limitations.

Explanation:

Statute of limitations are laws which states the time limit of when legal proceedings must be initiated between concerned parties from the date in which alleged offence was perpetrated.

In statue of limitations, the time limit for somebody is wronged to initiate legal action is not fixed in all jurisdiction. It means that depending on the nature of the alleged offense under statute of limitation, time allowed to institute legal actions varies.

Example of statue of limitation is that for certain states, the time limit to initiate legal case say on fraud is two years. It means that one must bring up the case in a court of law within the stipulated two years period. Once the two year grace elapse, one can no longer sue for fraud in the court of law.

Although there is no time limit for certain offence like murder case, sex offence with minor etc.

As in the case above, the judge threw away the case because according to the law of statute of limitation, a party that is wronged can only sue the wrong doer within the stipulated time as spelt out within the jurisdiction where the alleged offence was committed.

4 0

3 years ago