The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
<span>The nobles and the Church became obstacles for monarchs who wanted more power because they usually guard their rights and civil liberties in against of the monarchs. They collect their taxes by themselves and have their own group. They are stopping the monarchs to maximize their full royal power.</span>
I'd say A because in other countries people didnt have freedom or rights
Answer:
to weaken France and ensure it had no allies
Answer:
d. to protect against radical shifts in government that result from swift changes in popular opinion
Explanation:
The senate serves to "mediate" and reach proper agreements based on well thought out and thorough proceedings from a handful representative of the people. It works to protect against swift, radical changes in government as it checks and balances other government loopholes that could push for radical changes that may be harmful to the system.
