<u>Answer:</u>
<em>D. And thanks to my first story, I’d already met most of the school administrators in person and had the beginnings of an actual list of sources for future stories.
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The last statement of this except give the solid idea of what the entire story was all about. The purpose of writing this report lied solely on the information that would be obtained from the ground. That is the parties that were affected were in the right position of giving the reporter information about their challenges. Therefore that is the reason why their last opinion counted to the article the reporter was writing.
Answer:
dude whats the details. huh?
Explanation:
What Martin's questions reveal about her point of view toward Bates' work is that:
- Some inmates were able to relate to some of Shakespeare's works than many scholars because such inmates had such similar experiences.
This question is related to "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"
<h3>About "Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison"</h3>
"Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison" is an article that was written by Mitchel Martin who interviewed Laura Bates.
Laura Bates is known to be author of “Shakespeare Saved My Life: Ten Years of Solitary with the Bard." In the story, she shared how she successfully taught Shakespeare works to inmates in a maximum security prison.
With her interaction with Martin, we discover that Bates' work reveal that the prisoners could relate to some of the events that transpired in some of Shakespeare's plays because they've had similar experiences before.
Learn more about Teaching Shakespeare in Maximum Security Prison on brainly.com/question/11944939
Answer:
I would think the answer is D
Explanation:
Memoir reccounts personal experiences
