Answer:
The correct answer is: Supporting.
Explanation:
In psichological therapy terms, suppporting someone during a crisis is the best response not only because the aid the supporter can prove but also because how the supported can feel that is cared for. Supporting could also be counterproductive because it may send the message that the supported is unable to support themselves or get out of the situation that caused the crisis in first place, but despite this Supporting is the appropriate response to someone going through some frightening experience or crisis.
'A Quilt of a Country' is a commentary by Anna Quindlen for ''Newsweek'' on the
diversity of America, and according to that Americans have grudging fairness.
<span>Most Americans draw the
conclusion from “grudging fairness” that Modern immigrants or today’s
immigrants are similar to earlier or past American and also that Americans are
the hardest working people on earth</span>
Answer:
<u>Expressed:</u> The national government's expressed powers allow it to levy taxes, to coin money, to make war, to raise an army and navy, and to regulate interstate commerce.
<u>Implied:</u> Creating a national bank, drafting soldiers
Explanation:
Implied powers are powers not expressed in the constitution but are necessary and proper in order to carry out the expressed powers given to the government by the constitution.
For example:
To raise an army and navy (<u>expressed power</u>) they need to draft soldiers (<u>implied</u>) to ensure that they have an army large enough to protect us.
Radiation shield
security blanket
weathering the storms
<span>To divide we the people to weaken us, set us against each other with blame games and propaganda. Party loyalty blinders keep us from watching too closely what our own party representatives are doing against our own interests.
Like professional wrestlers they appear to be bitter rivals in public but are the best of friends behind closed doors. They have led us to think that only someone from their parties can win an election. If we vote for a third party candidate we have "thrown our vote away" on someone who stands no chance of winning and let that "evil other party" candidate win. We feel compelled to vote for the "lesser" of the two evils being offered.
Consider this: Both parties of the Senate said that the TARP bill lacked oversight to protect the taxpayer's money (concerning the original 3 page one passed by the House of Representatives). They claimed they were going to add protection and oversight to it. Then behind closed doors they added 137 pages of earmark spending and NO oversight or protection. Bush signed it and they closed the 110 Session of Congress knowing that they had an automatic pay raise in place. Both parties were involved so no evil other party blame games could be played.
Instead they faked outrage when the AIG bonus news came out and blamed the Management for not following rules which they had failed to put into the TARP bill in the first place. Watch this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu...</span>
