Answer:
But when the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, it officially repealed the three-fifths compromise. Section 2 of the amendment states that seats in the House of Representatives were to be determined based on “the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed."
Explanation:
Massachusetts Anti-Federalists Oppose the Three-Fifths Compromise. The ratification of the United States Constitution was the subject of intense debate between 1787 and 1789.
Answer: hope it helps :)))))))
Explanation:
The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached among state delegates during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. Whether and, if so, how slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for legislative representation and taxing purposes was important, as this population number would then be used to determine the number of seats that the state would have in the United States House of Representatives for the next ten years. The compromise solution was to count three out of every five slaves as people for this purpose. Its effect was to give the Southern states a third more seats in Congress and a third more electoral votes than if slaves had been ignored, but fewer than if slaves and free people had been counted equally
I believe the answer is: hindsight bias
Hindisight bias refers to mindset that make a person beleive that a certain event is predictable even if they have no objective measurement to make the prediction. Hindisight bias generally created by either memory distortion or self fulfilling prophecies.
The answer is argument. :)
Answer:
Explanation:
I'm sorry, but what are you trying to say?
