Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
Answer: promote hiring, create new projects, lower restrictions
Explanation:
it is not increase regulation because that makes the hiring process more strict because there would be more laws in place.
it is not raise more taxes, because that will cost everyone. When people have less money, that are not able to hire more people
The name of the policy is Network Access Control Policy .
This policy require members of a certain organization to use necessary computer security (such as anti-virus or VPN)/
This computer security will prevent hackers from entering your personal gadget and use it as an entrance to access organization's main system.
The answer to this question is <span>Increasing; weakens the effects of both reinforcement and punishment..
The more delay being imposed between a response and a consequence, the more our brain not be able to find the correlation between that response and consequence. If the response and consequence happen instantly (for example we feel burnt when touching fire) that our body will most likely to remember the consequence of that certain response.</span>
