Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency could be overturned through the subsequent Supreme ruling.
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency was a legal case in 2007. In this case, multiple cities and states including Massachusetts sued the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to force it to regulate the emission of pollutants.
Unexpectedly, EPA rejected the petition to control the emission of pollutants but the Supreme Court decided Massachusetts and the other petitioners had the right to sue EPA and that EPA needed to control the emission of pollutants including carbon dioxide.
This decision was quite controversial because 5 out of 9 justices approved it and many did not agree EPA had to control the emission of some pollutants. Because of this, the decision could be overturned through subsequent Supreme Court ruling that is the most common way to overturned previous decisions by the court that do not relate to the nation's fundamental law but specific laws.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1755400
Answer:
Hormones and neurotransmitters are different chemical messengers, the former produced by the endocrine glands and the latter by the nervous system. ... However, neurotransmitters' actions are short-lived while hormones act for longer periods of time.
Answer:
It affected those who heard the speeches by changing the way they thought and change their point of view
Explanation:
It changed their point of view because they were inspired to help change the way they acted and change the way they thought.
Answer:
C.) refusing to show up for work.
Explanation:
They refused to work to prove that they needed better work conditions that were sustainable and to get a better wage.
Hope this helps!!!!! :)