Question

There have been several controversial Supreme Court decisions in the past 50 years that many people believe should be overturned. Select one of the three cases listed below, and write a one- or two-paragraph response explaining how the decision in that case could be overturned. In your response, be sure to briefly describe the background of the case and which of the three ways — congressional statute, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling — you believe would be the most probable way the decision could be reversed.
Select one of these cases:

Kelo v. City of New London

Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Answer 1

Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency could be overturned through the subsequent Supreme ruling.

Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency was a legal case in 2007. In this case, multiple cities and states including Massachusetts sued the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to force it to regulate the emission of pollutants.

Unexpectedly, EPA rejected the petition to control the emission of pollutants but the Supreme Court decided Massachusetts and the other petitioners had the right to sue EPA and that EPA needed to control the emission of pollutants including carbon dioxide.

This decision was quite controversial because 5 out of 9 justices approved it and many did not agree EPA had to control the emission of some pollutants. Because of this, the decision could be overturned through subsequent Supreme Court ruling that is the most common way to overturned previous decisions by the court that do not relate to the nation's fundamental law but specific laws.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1755400