Answer:
-1 and 0
Step-by-step explanation:
X ^4+x = 0;
x*(x^3+1)=0;
x*[(x^3-x)+(x+1)]=0;
x*[x(x-1)(x+1)+(x+1)]=0;
x*(x+1)(x^2-x+1)=0;
Since x^2-x+1=0 has no intersection with the X-axis, there is no x value such that y=0
x=0 or -1
Answer:
a = 
- b
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
c(a + b) - d = f ( add d to both sides )
c(a + b) = f + d ( divide both sides by the multiplier c )
a + b = ( subtract b from both sides )
a = - b
Sure. From those choices, the only one that makes sense is that he
didn't perform enough trials. Technically, you can't expect the experimental
probability to match the theoretical probability until you've rolled it an infinite
number of times.
I have a hunch that even for only 60 trials, such a great discrepancy between
theory and experiment is beginning to suggest that the cubie is loaded. But
you really can't say. You just have to keep trying and watch how the numbers
add up.
Answer:
-14
Step-by-step explanation:
If you simplify the expression you get -14
My answer that i have gotten is 280
