Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

12

A person starts driving and travels 3 km east to a store. The person then turns around and travels 1 km west to another store. F

inally, the person travels 2 km west, back to the starting point. What distance has this person traveled?

1 answer:

hodyreva [135]3 years ago

8 0

4km west. 3-1=2 then 2+2=4 km west

You might be interested in

What is the average rate of change of the function f(x)=2(3)x from x = 2 to x = 4?

Dvinal [7]

this is kinda easy and im gonna assume that the 4 is a exponent cuz f(2)=2(3)^4 then f=81

4 0

4 years ago

Please help me if you don't mind work out the problem I'll give you brainly

svp [43]

Answer:

C) Izzy

Step-by-step explanation:

Justin typed 90 words in 2 minute:

work

405/9=45 words a minute

45*2=90

Remmy typed 84 words in 2 minute:

work

420/10=42 words a minute

42*2=84

Izzy typed 98 words in 2 minutes:

work

588/12= 49 words a minute

49*2 = 98

I hope this helps :)

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A snail traveled 3 over 8, of an inch in 3 minutes. How many inches can the snail travel in 9 minutes? Express the answer as a d

Elanso [62]

So, first of all, let's convert the fraction $\frac{3}{8}$ into a decimal, which would be 0.375 (3 divided by 8)

The snail travels this far in 3 minutes. To find out how far it travels in nine minutes, we have to find out how many times 3 goes into 9.

9 / 3 = 3

Now. we simply multiply our decimal by three in order to get our answer!

0.375 x 3 = 1.125 inches

The answer is 1.125 inches!

3 0

3 years ago

4/5 minus 1/3 plz i need help

IRISSAK [1]

Answer:

7/15

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1

We can't subtract two fractions with different denominators. So you need to get a common denominator. To do this, you'll multiply the denominators times each other... but the numerators have to change, too. They get multiplied by the other term's denominator.

So we multiply 4 by 3, and get 12.

Then we multiply 1 by 5, and get 5.

Next we give both terms new denominators -- 5 × 3 = 15.

So now our fractions look like this:

12

15

−

5

15

Step 2

Since our denominators match, we can subtract the numerators.

12 − 5 = 7

So the answer is:

7

15

Step 3

Last of all, we need to simplify the fraction, if possible. Can it be reduced to a simpler fraction?

To find out, we try dividing it by 2...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 3...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 5...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 7...

Nope! So now we try the next greatest prime number, 11...

No good. 11 is larger than 7. So we're done reducing.

6 0

3 years ago

What ratio can you use to determine the probability of a compound event?

maria [59]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Favorable outcome. To possible outcome

4 0

3 years ago