1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ch4aika [34]
3 years ago
10

Can someone help thanks

Social Studies
1 answer:
kumpel [21]3 years ago
8 0
I think the it is B hope that helps
You might be interested in
Alexander Hamilton and Friedrich List both wrote that a strong state was necessary if a nation intended to compete with the manu
AlekseyPX

Answer:

Great Britain

Explanation:

Great Britain was the first country that adopted the technology invented during the industrial revolution into its economy.

This makes them able to massively outperform another country in terms of producing goods /services.

Hamilton and List believe that temporarily avoid competition with Great Britain is the best decision for units States at that time. At least until the US also adopted new technologies into the economy.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these is a compound? A small blue sphere. A small blue sphere connected by 1 grey stick to a large green sphere. A larg
Leya [2.2K]

answer: B)

The second one.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Victor is a senator from Kansas who wants to help farmers. He has worked to encourage the passage of a law that would impose a b
Airida [17]

Answer:

The binding price floor will cause a surplus of wheat that farmers will be unable to sell.

Explanation:

The price floor is the lowest price that can be paid for goods, by binding price floor the senator requires by law a price for the goods above the equilibrium. The critics would say that since the wheat is binded price floor and cannot drop below the price stated by the senator, when the government inflate the price for the market the consumers will deny to pay the price stated and by that the consumption of wheat would fall creating a surplus of wheat, since the goods won’t be sold.  

8 0
3 years ago
Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is n
patriot [66]

Answer:

False Alternatives

Explanation:

Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is not morally prohibited. In fact, it would be highly praiseworthy. Therefore, giving half your money to charity is morally obligatory. - The previous argument provides an example of False Alternatives

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
True or false? logic and formal proof is a recent mathematical development.
andre [41]
No false it has been around since the time of the Egyptians

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Freud stressed the importance of ________.
    6·2 answers
  • Which area of the world was affected FIRST by the French Revolution
    14·1 answer
  • When Angelou describes the fact that she feels not many teens survive the crucial developmental years, she says that most turn i
    6·1 answer
  • 2. Provide a specific, original example in which your desire to be consistent might lead you to change an important, attitude, b
    15·2 answers
  • Think about a new invention you would like to create
    11·1 answer
  • Why is cooperative advertising the most common form of advertising used by whole sales and advertisers
    11·1 answer
  • Joaquin is a child diagnosed with adhd. his school counselor says it is genetic; thus, joaquin must be medicated. psychiatrist f
    13·1 answer
  • Alexithymia is___________? Group of answer choices learned behavior from parents hypersensitivity constraining own feelings dimi
    10·1 answer
  • Who are the specific people associated with getting Texas land
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following are reasons why Indians disliked British rule?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!