Answer:
This is an example of habituation.
Explanation:
Habituation refers to the decrease in the response to a stimulus after a prolonged exposition to that stimulus. In the situation we are analyzing here, you are experiencing habituation. The stimulus - the sound of the tornado siren - no longer provokes a response from you. When it was a novelty, something you hadn't gotten used to yet, you would be startled. However, after hearing it over and over again, you no longer jump at its sound. You are now habituated to it.
The correct answer is: Changes in policy and representation in Congress. Hope this helps.
META ANALYSIS is a research technique for combining the results of all the published and even unpublished results on one question and drawing a conclusion based on the entire set of studies on the topic.
A meta-analysis is a research technique for combining the results of all the published and even unpublished results on one question and drawing a conclusion based on the entire set of studies on the topic.
In many cases, researchers can combine many studies that have been done on one topic, and get an overall big picture view of how an intervention works compared to placebo or compared to another treatment.
It is a quantitative review of several studies with the goal of determining their combined effects on a topic of interest. This can provide more accurate and statistically significant results than just one study alone, and there are several different methods that researchers use to draw conclusions from meta-analyses.
The the benefits of using meta-analysis in your research, is you can perform this analysis in Excel to maximize its usefulness in your own business research studies.
To learn more about Meta Analysis refer:
brainly.com/question/28214613
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Technological improvements and reduced equipment costs have made converting solar energy directly into electricity far more cost-efficient in the last decade. However, the threshold of economic viability for solar power (that is, the price per barrel to which oil would have to rise in order for new solar power plants to be more economical than new oil-fired power plants) is unchanged at thirty-five dollars. Which of the following, if true, does most to help explain why the increased cost-efficiency of solar power has not decreased its threshold of economic viability?
(A) The cost of oil has fallen dramatically. (B) The reduction in the cost of solar-power equipment has occurred despite increased raw material costs for that equipment. (C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants. (D) Most electricity is generated by coal-fired or nuclear, rather than oil-fired, power plants. (E) When the price of oil increases, reserves of oil not previously worth exploiting become economically viable."
Answer:
(C) Technological changes have increased the efficiency of oil-fired power plants.
Explanation:
Economic viability is able to reveal the degree of acceptance of consumers in relation to a specific product. This viability is important to understand how the product will be received in the market and how profitable or not it can be for those who produce it.
Economic viability is usually greater when the cost and benefit ratio of the product or service is favorable, however this is not always the case.
Regarding the use of solar energy, although technological changes have made the installation and equipment of this type of energy more cost-effective, these technological changes have also increased the efficiency of oil plants. As a result, the economic viability of solar energy has declined.
