Answer: False
Explanation:
Class Consciousness could be as when an individual realizes his class in a society, organization or a gathering amongst people. Class Consciousness tends to affect growth in an organization as everyone in the organization will tend to look down on those who are not close to their class. This would discourage uniformity and team work in the organization and would destroy the aim of the company doing well globally.
Anthropologists call their relationship "clientage".
Clientage is a type of relationship that exists in the Radch. Customers offer their reliability and administrations as a byproduct of budgetary help and renown of their support's well off house. Clientage is a standout amongst the most imperative social connections for a Radchaai, seen as a type of affection, and incorporates an official contract made in the Temple of Amaat. Customers from a low social foundation may confront bits of gossip about having bowed to their support.
It's a ridiculous subject and we have more important things to keep on our plate then fairness. Life is not fair, just live and let live.
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.