1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
4 years ago
5

Which selection below details circumstances that are referred to as the 'law of soil'?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Vladimir79 [104]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B. a person born within the borders of the United States or its territories is granted US citizenship

Explanation:

The law of soil states that every person born within the borders or inside the territories of the United States is instantly granted citizenhip no matter its background or family tree, the law of soil grants worldwide the nationality to a child of the country where the child was born, this is respected in almost all of the world.

Yuki888 [10]4 years ago
3 0
Your answer is <span>B. a person born within the borders of the United States or its territories is granted US citizenship. I hope this helps! :)

Have a great rest of the day.

</span>
You might be interested in
Who are the four American presidents who lost the popular vote, but won the Electoral College?
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

1.John Quincy Adams (1824)

This is the first of two occasions when the man ultimately elected president first lost both the popular vote and the electoral vote.

Back in 1824, there were four contenders for the presidency, all members of the same Democratic-Republican party: Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, William Crawford and Henry Clay.

When the votes were tallied, Andrew Jackson won a plurality of both the popular vote and the Electoral College. But to win the presidency, you need more than a plurality (the most electoral votes), you need a majority (more than half), and Jackson was 32 electoral votes shy of the mark. In cases where no presidential candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the Constitution sends the vote to the House of Representatives. According to the 12th Amendment, the House can only vote on the top three vote-getters, which eliminated Clay from the running, but that didn’t stop Clay from allegedly wielding his influence as Speaker of the House. The House voted to make Adams president, even though Jackson had beaten Adams by 99 electoral votes to 84. Adams turned around and appointed Clay as his Secretary of State, infuriating Jackson, who accused his opponents of stealing the election in a corrupt bargain.

2.Rutherford B. Hayes (1876)

Similar to 1824, the election of 1876 wasn’t decided by the voters, but by Congress. This time, though, the Constitution didn’t have an answer to the electoral crisis at hand.  

The race was an ugly one between Republican Rutherford B. Hayes and Democrat Samuel Tilden, and when the votes were counted, Tilden won 184 electoral votes, exactly one vote shy of the majority needed at the time to win the presidency. Hayes only won 165, but 20 more electoral votes were still in dispute.

The Republicans objected to the results from Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina, since both parties claimed their candidate had won the states. What now? The Constitution had a backup plan if no candidate won a majority of electoral votes, but there was no such process for resolving a dispute.  

So Congress created a bipartisan Federal Electoral Commission composed of House representatives, senators and Supreme Court justices. The Commission voted to give all 20 disputed electoral votes to Hayes, who won the election by the thinnest of margins: 185 to 184.  

Why did the Commission decide to hand the election to Hayes, who had lost both the popular and electoral vote? Most historians believe there was a deal brokered between the two parties. The Democrats, whose stronghold was the South, agreed to let Hayes be president in return for the Republicans promising to pull all federal troops from former Confederate states. That’s one of the main reasons why Reconstruction was abandoned in 1877.

3.Benjamin Harrison (1888)  

The 1888 race between incumbent Democratic President Grover Cleveland and Republican challenger Benjamin Harrison was riddled with corruption. Both parties accused the other of paying citizens to vote for their candidate. So-called “floaters” were voters with no party loyalty who could be sold to the highest bidder.  

In Indiana, a letter surfaced that allegedly showed Republicans plotting to buy up voters and to disrupt the opposition’s own bribery efforts. Meanwhile, Southern Democrats did everything in their power to suppress the Black vote, most of whom aligned with the Republicans, the “party of Lincoln.”  

When the nasty race was finally over, Cleveland and the Democrats took the entire South while Republican Harrison won the North and West, including Cleveland’s home state of Indiana by a slim margin. By sweeping the South, Cleveland won the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes, but he still lost the electoral vote 233 to 168.  

Four years later, Cleveland came back and beat Harrison, becoming the first and only U.S. president to serve two non-consecutive terms.

 4.George W. Bush (2000)    

For the next 112 years, election results were back to normal with the winner of the Electoral College also taking the popular vote. Then came the hotly contested presidential election of 2000 that made it all the way to the Supreme Court.

The candidates were Republican George W. Bush, son of the former president, and Democrat Al Gore, who served as vice president under President Bill Clinton. On election night, the results were too close to call in three states: Oregon, New Mexico and Florida. Gore ended up winning Oregon and New Mexico by the slimmest of margins (just 366 votes in New Mexico), which left Florida to decide the presidency.

   

8 0
3 years ago
Workers and firms often enter into contracts that fix prices or wages, sometimes for years at a time. If the price level turns o
Mashutka [201]

Answer:

Long term benefits and security

Explanation:

There are five benefits to entering into a long term contract:

  1. Established "order of business": Most jobs require a period for employee training and setting up SOP. In firms with long term contract employee turnover is not high and these people become well trained in the field and minimal time is wasted training new people too frequently
  2. Higher investment return; most businesses need a start-up fee for buying the tools and offices that are needed. This fee for long time contracts will be a one-time fee for a long lived company.  Money will be made in the long run to cover the initial investment
  3. Better support for customer service: the longer a business is kept open the easier it is for the employees to understand that there are specifics about customers that can make their experience worth while
  4. Stronger Relationships can be built with other business for collaborative advantages as the long term business will show that they are committed to the firm and the brand that they represent.
  5. Better Protection from people around such as the auxiliary staff that have become familiar with the persons in the company. They will be more protective of the physical building as well as the people that they have become very familiar with.
4 0
3 years ago
What do you mean by international personality
zheka24 [161]

The concept of an international personality is one that describes a state, organization, or individual that holds this status under international law and which is recognized by international law as having rights and obligations; sometimes, it can refer to a state, organization, or individual that holds this status under international law.

<em>Hope this helps :)</em>

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many soiled were lost at the battle of somme verdin and ypres?
cestrela7 [59]
<span>During the battle, which lasted from July to November of 1916, the British suffered about 420,000 casualties, which included many from volunteer battalions. The French lost about 200,000, and Germans casualties are estimated at 500,000. Nearly 60,000 British troops were lost, about 20,000 of them killed on the first day of battle, which stands as the highest known one-day casualty total in history as of 2014. During the entire battle, the British and French gained only about 7.5 miles of ground into German territory.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
True or False: Hinduism is a combination of cultures that merged over many years.
coldgirl [10]
Answer:
the answer is true
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nick's roommate is attending a networking event for his business fraternity this weekend. He says, "Nick, you are so good at goi
    8·1 answer
  • Compare Christianity to Buddisam
    10·1 answer
  • Britain acquired Canada from France
    13·2 answers
  • During the __________ Sherman led approximately 100,000 troops on a quest to take the economic center of the South and destroy a
    14·1 answer
  • Why did france assist the united states?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is statements FALSE? Logical fallacies are unethical, because they attempt to convince with style rather
    8·1 answer
  • Sharkey, P., &amp; Faber, J. W. (2014). Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dich
    8·1 answer
  • Dr. Murray seeks to understand how and why people change over time. She studies all kinds of people from different age groups, c
    15·1 answer
  • One industry unique to classical china was
    9·1 answer
  • Which stayement describes a benefit of international trade
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!