Answer:
Option a are the correct answer for the above question.
Explanation:
- If any user wants to change any old file with any new file holding the new code. Then he needs to---
- firstly open the old file
- Then change to the new file and
- Then save the file with the new name.
- The above option is stated from the option a. So an answer is an option a while the other is not because:-
- With the work of the options b, the new code will not save into the file.
- With the work of the options c, the new file also contains the same code as the old file.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
For example, We need to write down the names of student in a school for survey purposes, rather than tell everyone to write their names on a sheet of paper and submit, we can instruct that names be written according to their classes and then written on the class sheets alphabetically.
Logically names will be written according to the classes from Class 1 - 10, then on the class sheet alphabetically from A - Z. its better represented that way for easy understanding and better collation and interpretation of data.
Answer:
Ex post facto hypothesizing
Explanation:
ex post facto hypothesizing Is invalid in science. It involves making hypothesis after noticing some form of relationship which has been noticed.
The director concluded that the program was undoubtedly effective, and noticed that there really could not possibly have been an increase in actual abuse due to her program. He noticed it was due to an increase in reportage of abuse due to closer monitoring in the daily home visits. This hypothesis validates ex post facto hypothesizing.
Answer:
an anti-virus program such as avg