Answer:
if no one followed social editiqute the economy wouldn't work.
Answer:
There are many pros and cons to this concept.
The pros are that we have better materials for protection and offense for our military. Also, this gives individuals better defense, as well.
The cons to this concept is that people in the wrong state of mind can easily injure or worse kill vulnerable people.
So what does this say about the United States in general?
The United States is like a pan balance; if there aren’t many weapons, there will be fewer massacres, shootings and robberies. But, say someone in a situation where that does happen, there is a higher and unfortunate chance that they won’t be able to protect themselves. If there are lots of weapons, there will be more crime, but also an increase in defense & protection and a decrease in vulnerability.
The United States is full of extremely intelligent people which can have dangerous consequences. An increase in weapons technology is another step up in nature and it shows America’s power, brilliance, and intelligence. This will make the U.S. military undefeatable.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't know what Answer A really is. Usually there is a numbered section preceding the clause. The clause does not stand by itself -- or nothing I've seen does that.
Article 4 section 5 clause 3: This part of the constitution tells how the constitution may be amended. To amend or change anything about the constitution requires a procedure. This then is the procedure.
I think the answer you want is B. The wording is "To Constitute Tribunals inferior to the the Supreme Court." This whole section 8 Article I has to do with the powers given to congress. Clause 9 is just one of these powers.
Answer: The statement about New Federalism that is not true is the last one: "<u>President Reagan was able to promote new federalism consistently throughout his administration".</u>
Explanation: New Federalism was a plan launched by Robert Nixon during his presidency, which extended from 1969 until 1974, and continued by President Reagan. However, <u>Reagan's proposals</u> within this plan <u>were not as successful as Nixon's</u>. Moreover, <u>some of Reagan's proposals were not even implemented since they went against another programs or against the interests of particular groups</u>. In that way, it cannot be said that President Reagan was able to promote new federalism in a consistent way; therefore, the last statement provided is false.
