When a person owes more on an item (like a car or house) than it is worth, the person is said to be <u>upside down</u> on the loan.
<h3><u>Describe an upside-down loan.</u></h3>
You have an upside-down auto loan if you owe more money than the car is truly worth. You may need to make additional payments or modify your insurance coverage in order to prevent being upside-down on your loan or, at the very least, to shorten the amount of time you are in this perilous financial situation.
When you owe more on a car loan than the vehicle is worth, the loan is considered upside-down. If your car is worth $12,000 but your loan total is $15,000, for instance, your loan would be in the negative. You have $3,000 in negative equity in this situation.
It's not always a problem to have an outstanding auto loan. If you don't intend to sell your car, you can make loan payments until the balance is paid off. It won't affect the way you communicate with your lender.
Learn more about upside-down loans with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/24173549
#SPJ4
Answer:
22%
Explanation:
Net income = Annual cash flow - Depreciation
Net income = 24350 - (80,000-5,000 / 5)
Net income = 24350 - 15,000
Net income = $9350
Average investment = Beg. value + End. Value / 2
Average investment = 80,000 + 5,000 / 2
Average investment = $42,500
Annual rate of return = Net income / Average investment * 100
Annual rate of return = $9350 / $42,500 * 100
Annual rate of return = 0.22 * 100
Annual rate of return = 22%
Answer:
option (c) $25 million
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
The marginal propensity to consume in Frugalia, MPC = 0.60
Increase in spending = $10 million
Now,
The total increase in income
= 
× Increase in spending
on substituting the respective values, we get
= 
× $10 million
= 
× $10 million
or
= 2.5 × $10 million
or
= $25 million
Hence,
The answer is option (c) $25 million
Answer: No, this was merely Carl's opinion.
Explanation:
Labelling a statement as an opinion generally protects the person who said it from defamation suits however this is not always the case.
If the opinion is based on disclosed and well known facts, the action is free of defamatory or libel charges.
This seems to be the case in this scenario as his column seems to be based on the performances for the year.
Bottomline is, Stella cannot sue Carl for libel as it is his opinion.
Answer:
$137,200; $103,600
Explanation:
In 2015:
Free cash flow:
= Net cash flow from operating activity - Capital expenditure
= $294,000 - (70% × $224,000)
= $294,000 - $156,800
= $137,200
In 2016:
Free cash flow:
= Net cash flow from operating activity - Capital expenditure
= $280,000 - (70% × $252,000)
= $280,000 - $176,400
= $103,600
