Answer:
George McClellan had high organization within his army and boosted their morale by making frequent trips to his units and encouraging them.
Explanation:
George McClellan was a major general during the American Civil War from 1861 to 1865 fought between Northern United States and Southern United States. The war was because of the slavery of the blacks, the north did not support slavery while the south supported slavery.
George McClellan had high organization within his army and boosted their morale by making frequent trips to his units and encouraging them.
The lengthening of the barrel and the transition from muskets to rifles.<span> The longer barrel helped with accuracy. With rifles, the US could fire at the British from a safe distance and with accuracy.</span>
When a person pays bail, they are temporarily freed from prison. Even though bail allows the person to be free temporarily, the person is still expected to show up to court on the date of their court case.
The rhetoric's that was used in these speeches have been grouped below:
<u>Evil empire speech:</u>
- Portrayed the soviet union as an enemy.
- appealed to audiences sense of justice
<u>Tear down this wall speech:</u>
- appealed to audiences sense of morality.
- Challenged the soviet union to do the right thing.
<h3>Summary of the evil empire speech</h3>
This speech was delivered by Ronald Reagan during the cold war by the US and the Soviets.
He referred to the soviet as a force of evil that was a threat to the modern world.
<h3>Summary of the Tear Down This Wall" speech</h3>
This speech was given by Reagan to Gorbachev urging him to tear down the wall that they had built in Berlin.
Read more on the Soviet union here:
brainly.com/question/545380
No, the freedom of speech is one of the most important rights in a democracy along with the freedom of press. It allows several voices to rise and be heard. But it does not means that you can say whatever you want whenever you want.
You can find the foundations of the freedom of speech in the first amendment where it says:
<em>"Amendment I
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>Congress </em><em>shall make no law </em><em>respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or </em><em>abridging the freedom of speech</em><em>, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" </em>
But there are exceptions to the rule. You can´t say whatever you want as the supreme court have showed in several cases. From this we can extract some categories where the first amendment doesn´t work:
- Incitement: When its directed to inciting or producing inminent lawless action.
- False statements of facts: there are some types of this unprotected according to the supreme court: those said with <em>"sufficiently culpable mental state" </em>can be subject of criminal or civil liability. Secondly libel and slander and finally negligent statements or facts can be subject of civil liability.
As a conclusion we can say that the freedom of speech is a fundamental right in a healthy democracy but we must take care of it. We can´t say whatever we want, well actually we can but you have to be responsible of your acts.
