Answer:
A. Pangeans are historically untrustworthy.
Explanation:
The speaker's point of view is most likely that Pangeans are historically untrustworthy. At the beginning of the passage, he states that Pangea has long yearned to possess their resources. That's why he thinks they're likely to attack. Based on the following statements, we can conclude that Pangeans already tried defeating them. He doesn't explicitly state that it was them who attacked (<em>We have never been defeated before </em>- he doesn't say by whom), but based on the context, we can make this conclusion.
The speaker says that his people will defend what is theirs, which means that they will respond to violence by violence. To him, war isn't the last resort for resolving conflict.
Democratic principles are something he obviously treasures (<em>what makes us fair-minded and democratic is our strong national character</em>), and he never says anything about suspending them during wartime.
This is why option A is the correct one.
We can actually see here the sentence below changes mood. Therefore it is a YES.
<h3>What is mood?</h3>
In grammar, grammatical mood actually talks about the form of a verb as seen in a sentence. It usually denotes the tone of a verb used in a sentence which clearly states what the writer or speaker is saying.
There are three main verb moods. They are:
- Indicative mood
- Imperative mood
- Subjunctive mood.
We see here that mood isn't "feelings" but rather a form of verb that is written or spoken with an intention.
Thus, we see here that the given changes mood. This is true because there is a "take stock" and then a "stop".
Learn more about moods on brainly.com/question/25843194
#SPJ1
The answer is A. I just took the quiz
