Answer:
This is a violation of the intellectual property rights of the owners of the images and materials.
Explanation:
It is restricted to use trademarked images and copyrighted materials without the consent of the owner. If this law is violated then the person found guilty might have to pay a penalty for it and this type of situation is often referred to as copyright infringement. If a copyright material has been used to gain profit by the charged guilty person, then he even has to pay the court for the profit he made.
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
The discussion started with Mr. Friedman explaining how the want and setting up on MNCs have become way more easier than it was a couple of decades ago. This is because the role of business in the society has increases. With increasing population the demand needs to be met on that level as well. Agreeing with the latter point Mr. Karthik said that yes, the demand needs to met but that should not make MNC and their setup easy. The quality according to him suffers.
Mr.Karthik said that the MNCs are also huge retail shops who must make sure that their production of goods and services are worth opting for. This is actually what business is supposed to do. Unlike the two gentlemen who are busy taking out the judgement on what is right and wrong in business and role it plays in the society, Mr.SInger started to add an important aspect. According to his view the greater role of business today, lies in the fact that it must benefit the society and reap positive externalities.
This is where the Corporate social responsibility comes in. The usage of resources and then replenishing it back into the nature is very very important according to Mr.Singer. He explained why the industries should not be given the liberty to discharge waste anywhere but must be either penalised or made to indulge in the act of social responsibility. With such conclusive thought s all th three agreed on a larger perspective of business.
<span>If the customer takes legal action for this, both Tasha and the siding company are liable because both misled the customers and they did this intentionally.
But Tasha was told that </span><span>this was a standard practice for the siding company, so she is doing her job as told by the company but doing this will misled the customers so that is why both are liable.</span>
York assets started the year with $110,000-$60,000= $50,000 net assets. So for the current year, the revenues were $110,000 and expenses were $50,000 so add $110,000 to the $50,000 = $160,000 - $50,000= $110,000 net for this year. Since the total dividends are $45,000 then $45,000/$110,000= %40.9 increase in the stockholder's equity for the year which is very good.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because you want to hire those who know what their doing and have experience
please give me brainiest