Answer:
Option A
Explanation:
In simple words, Valence is individuals mental attitude towards result in second order. In this situation, the consequence of the first requirement is title earning and the consequence of that same second order is really the monetary support the competitors receive from either the USOC. Motivational Force (MF) = Survival rate * Instrumentality * Valence as according to Vroom's expectation principle.
The answer is "Certified Computer Forensic Technician, Basic".
Certified Computer Forensic Technician, Basic is Three (3) years experience specifically identified with the scientific procurement and examination of computerized gadgets including yet not restricted to hard drives, tablets or potentially phones while utilized by a law authorization office or enterprise.
Successfully complete an aggregate of forty (40) hours preparing course(s) for the measurable obtaining and investigation of hard drives, tablets or potentially PDAs given by an affirmed office, association or organization.
Give an account report itemizing your experience got from the measurable obtaining and investigation of computerized gadgets including however not restricted to hard drives, tablets or potentially phones of no less than ten (10) scientific cases while utilized by a law implementation office or company.
Answer:
$3,483.17
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of cost allocated to the Cafeteria under the step method
Using this formula
Allocation to Cafeteria=[Cafeteria/(Cafeteria+Producing Department A+Producing Department B)]×Budgeted costs
Let plug in the formula
Allocation to Cafeteria=[25/(25 + 308 + 287)] x $72,450
Allocation to Cafeteria=(25/520)×$72,450
Allocation to Cafeteria=0.0480769231×$72,450
Allocation to Cafeteria=$3,483.17
Therefore the amount of cost allocated to the Cafeteria under the step method would be $3,483.17
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
