Similar to a stock split, a stock <u>dividend</u> also distributes additional shares of stock to existing stockholders on a pro rata basis at no cost to the stockholders.
A stock split is a decision made by the board of directors of a firm to issue more shares to present owners in order to increase the number of shares outstanding.
A stock split is a division of issued shares in a ratio determined by the company, whereas a stock dividend is a dividend paid in the form of extra shares. While in a stock split, already issued shares are divided in accordance with a predetermined ratio, a stock dividend gives stockholders extra shares.
To know more about Stock Split here
brainly.com/question/24080551
#SPJ4
The answer is The income effect.
Income effect is described as the change in demand of a service or good brought on by change in the income of a consumer.It is observed in two cases first is when income of person increases and second is when price of goods or service decreases.
The scenario given in the question is an example of second case as the price of burger was less than normal Steve perceived his income to be able to buy more product in same price
Answer:
increase assets by $13,000, increase liabilities by $13,000 and have no effect on equity.
Explanation:
Given that
The total cost of purchase of delivery truck = $15,000
Cash paid = $2,000
The accounting equation equals to
Total assets = Total liabilities + owners equity
The remaining amount left would be equal to
= $15,000 - $2,000
= $13,000
So it would increase the assets for $13,000 as the delivery truck is purchased plus there is also an increase in liabilities for $13,000 as it signed a note payable and there is no effect on equity
Answer:
lending of depositor's funds
Answer:
III only.
Cultural attitudes toward antitrust law differ.
Explanation:
Competition law is an area of law that seeks to maintain a level playing field for all participants in an industry by protecting them against anti-competitive conduct by companies.
For example two major players in an industry may collaborate to raise price of goods.
However in foreign competition law we have to consider that cultural attitudes towards antitrust law differs. What is accepted in one country may not apply in another. So there is absence of litigation when considering competition in the foreign scene.