The correct answer is:
The author's purpose for the allusion is to emphasize how seriously the relationship is doomed.
Romeo and Juliet was a tragic story. Two star-crossed lovers who could not be together, and have a sustaining relationship. Comparing Sasha and Karl to this really shows how these two face a similar proposition. Their relationship is doomed. They can't be together like Romeo and Juliet could not be together.
Individuals construct their own life course through the choices and actions they take within the opportunities and constraints of history and social circumstances
a. true
Law making power--this article gives Congress the power to create laws which are "necessary and proper".
This power of Congress is one that impacts the day-to-day of Americans' lives. This is why the votes for congressional representatives are so important as they are creating the laws dictating the rights of citizens.
Answer:
Explanation:
1.<em> Free education is actually not free after all. While America offers students a free public school system, revenue must still be raised to pay for public education in elementary through high schools. Taxes (from local municipalities, state and federal taxing entities) are often cited as a funding source for school districts. And that is often the case. This section addresses all manner of school funding issues, such as how schools are funded, criteria for funding, and ways funds are allocated. This section also provides information on options for student loan repayment, what to do when you can't pay back your loans, and more.</em>
2. A good community outreach officer needs to let go of that stereotypical cop persona and take a knee. Literally, drop on one knee and meet their 5-year-old son or daughter eye to eye. Take your shiny badge off of your chest and let the kid hold it. Pretend you’re putting handcuffs on him for a staged photo op. Give the 5-year-old your baton and let him swing it. Then notice a crowd forming with their iPhones; ready to capture that moment in time of the sharply dressed uniformed cop playing, teasing and joking with their little sons and daughters and breaking down barriers that community members harbor.
<em>Please give brainliest if you like the answer!!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!</em>
Her continued presence is morally acceptable in order to eradicate discrimination and promote equality. She has an ethical obligation to receive respect, be treated equally to other employees in the organization, and be free from harassment.
Discriminating against Hispanics in America is wrong for everyone, not just Hispanics. Professionals also have their own codes of ethics. It is moral to continue the employee's employment if she has a reasonable reason to think that by doing so, she can improve her behavior.
The action is ethical if the employee thinks she can prove it to the AG, EEOC, or law enforcement (as necessary) with enough documentation of the behavior. It might be ethical or it might not, depending on the facts, if the employee is facing a personal dilemma regarding her employability and behavior.
To learn more about ethical obligation here,
brainly.com/question/27824491
#SPJ4
