Like his father, Charles I imprisoned his adversaries without a fair trial and milked the nation for money. By 1628, he needed Parliament's help and was forced to sign the Petition of Right, but he ignored the rules of it and dissolved Parliament. Charles and Laud tried to force the Anglican prayer book on the Scottish, but they revolted. Charles needed funds to quell the rebellion, so he called on Parliament again. Parliament rebelled this time, claiming that it could not dissolve without its approval. In 1642, he lashed back, bringing his troops to the House of Commons to seize its radical leaders.
Explanation:
Like his father, Charles I imprisoned foes without a fair trial and squeezed the nation for money. By 1628, he needed Parliament's help and was forced to sign the Petition of Right, but he ignored the rules of it and dissolved Parliament. Charles and Laud tried to impose the Anglican prayer book on the Scottish, but they revolted. Charles I needed funds to suppress the rebellion, so he called on Parliament again. Parliament rebelled this time, claiming that Parliament could not be dissolved without its own consent. In 1642, he lashed back bringing his troops to the House of Commons to arrest its radical leaders.
Answer:
a blosseming culture and arts
Explanation:
A slave is a person that belongs to another one and is treated as property. Serfs, I'm not so sure about this now, were renting the land out from the landowners.
No, it was not a wrong decision because the aim behind this was to develop the country through increase in trade.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The decision granted by the Mughal emperor Jahangir to trade with the East India company was done with the intention to increase the trade of the country with East India company and then lead to the growth and development of the country.
With the increase of the trade, there would be more employment opportunities in the country and there would be more choices with the consumers to increase their standards of living their life.
13th amendment ////////////
