1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MakcuM [25]
3 years ago
6

What could happen if it is a concurrent jurisdiction situation and the plaintiff flies in the State court, rather than in a fede

ral court?
History
2 answers:
Kitty [74]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Concurrent jurisdiction allows more than one court to have the authority to hear the same case

Explanation:

Concurrent jurisdiction permits more than one court to have the power to listen to a similar case. This happens in typical cases, just as criminal cases. In numerous states, an individual can sue for a separation in the nearby locale level court, family court, or any of the area courts in the country. Remember, that each of the 50 states and the U.S. Domains reserves the option to choose their courts' locale so that it will differ state to state.

Since a decent variety locale gives both the state and the national government ward over the area, the groups and the topic of the case, at that point, both court frameworks can hear the case.

77julia77 [94]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

What would happen if it is a concurrent jurisdiction situation and the plaintiff flies in the State court, rather than in a federal court, is that the two different courts -State and Federal- have the faculty to hear the same case. It doesn't matter if it is a criminal case or a civil case. Litigants can decide the court they feel most comfortable to air their differences.

You might be interested in
How did the Supreme Court rule in Korematsu v.<br> United States?
Olegator [25]

Answer:

Korematsu asked the Supreme Court of the United States to hear his case. On December 18, 1944, a divided Supreme Court ruled, in a 6-3 decision, that the detention was a “military necessity” not based on race.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Did Marco polo had a physical features on his journey?
slega [8]
Yes he did I d k but I can not remember at all so look it up
5 0
3 years ago
In response to British control of Boston in 1775, colonists
Margarita [4]

Answer:

formed militias to respond to the control

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was Sher shah suri? describe his Administration and the revenue system.​
tangare [24]
He was a leader who worked for the wellfare of the masses
4 0
3 years ago
Probable cause protects people’s rights by making sure that
boyakko [2]

Answer: Option D, private property is only searched when reasonable.

Explanation: Probably cause basically means that a police officer needs reasonable suspicion to search your car, house ect, if they do not have reasonable suspicion they must have a warrant to search any of ones property, it prevents unjust searches. Hope this helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was happening at the same time that Crittenden was pushing a
    7·2 answers
  • In order to address labor shortages during the war Japan
    7·1 answer
  • What resulted in african american soldiers being accepted into the armed services?
    8·2 answers
  • Help with this please
    11·1 answer
  • Which view was NOT included in John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government (1690)?
    12·2 answers
  • Find the surface area of the regular hexagonal prism. Round your answer to the nearest hundredth.
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Western allies respond to Stalin's blockade of Berlin?
    9·1 answer
  • What is a fresco?
    13·2 answers
  • 1. Which two nations border Spain?
    10·1 answer
  • 3. What does Willam's seizure of the English throne show about the transfer of royal power in the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!