Answer:
The correct answer is:
Post hoc fallacy.
Explanation:
The post hoc fallacy is an argument based in the fact that an event happens just after the other, in this case it does not mean that just because the historian predicted the fact the result is a consequence of what he said, or that what he said was true. In this order, the fallacy uses the temporal consequence as an argument. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that temporal sequence is naturally part of the causality process.
They can put checks and balance on each other.
Explanation:
Congressional investigations not only help legislators make better policy decisions, but they are central to the system of checks and balances. Investigatory hearings can uncover presidential abuses of power and corruption, such as the Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s or Watergate in the 1970s.
Answer:
C. executive
D. life
<em>Hope that helps!</em>
Explanation:
